IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Az atipikus munka térnyerésének okai a tudásgazdaságban
[Reasons for the spread of atypical work in the knowledge economy]

Author

Listed:
  • Szabó, Katalin
  • Négyesi, Áron

Abstract

Az utóbbi egy-két évtizedben visszaszorulóban van az ipari társadalomra jellemző stabil, időhatárok nélküli (számos juttatással és biztosítékkal körülbástyázott) foglalkoztatás. Feltartóztathatatlanul terjednek ellenben az atipikus foglalkoztatás legkülönfélébb formái - a munkaerő-kölcsönzéstől egészen a harmadik világbeli háttérirodákban végzett távmunkáig. A szerzők az atipikus munkát az új intézményi iskola gondolkodási keretei közé helyezve, kiemelik a humántőke-specifikusság mérséklődésének a szerepét a foglalkoztatási viszonyokban. A munka „eloldozása”, a koncentrált gyári munka időbeli és térbeli dekompozíciója a gyárrendszer történelmi megjelenésével összemérhető változás. Az „eloldozott” munka logikus következménye a tudásgazdaság fejlődési mintáinak. Az információs technológia logikájának megfelelően a termékeket, termelési folyamatokat alkotó modulok - hasonlóan a gazdasági szervezetek sejtjeihez - önállósulnak, mindegyik külön életet él, végtelen kombinációs lehetőséget nyitva meg. Ugyanez a trend rajzolódik ki a munka világában is, amelyben a szilárd, kötött, statikus, biztos formák változtathatóvá, „folyékonnyá”, dinamikussá és bizonytalanná válnak. Ez lendületet ad a tudásgazdaságnak, amelyben a nomád munkavállalók a csizmájuk talpán viszik a tudást egyik projekttől a másikig, egyik gazdasági egységből, országból, régióból a másikba. Az érem másik oldala azonban az, hogy a munkavállalók - az alapvető kompetenciákat hordozó kulcsembereken kívül - kicserélhetők, eldobhatók, visszahívhatók, áthelyezhetők, egy szóval labilisak lesznek. Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: J2, J6, O3.

Suggested Citation

  • Szabó, Katalin & Négyesi, Áron, 2004. "Az atipikus munka térnyerésének okai a tudásgazdaságban [Reasons for the spread of atypical work in the knowledge economy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 46-65.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=659
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 1987. "Book Reviews," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Armen Alchian & Susan Woodward, 1997. "The Firm is Dead; Long Live the Firm: A Review of Oliver E. Williamson's The Economic Institutions of Capitalism," Chapters, in: Svetozar Pejovich (ed.), The Economic Foundations of Property Rights, chapter 15, pages 206-220, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Masten, Scott E & Meehan, James W, Jr & Snyder, Edward A, 1991. "The Costs of Organization," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 1-25, Spring.
    4. Claude Ménard (ed.), 2000. "Institutions, Contracts and Organizations," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1921.
    5. Cohen, Stephen S & Zysman, John & DeLong, Bradford J, 2000. "Tools for Thought: What is New and Important about the "E-conomy"?," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt0c97w1gn, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    6. Unknown, 1987. "Book Review," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(02), pages 1-2, August.
    7. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    8. Cohen, Stephen S & Zysman, John & DeLong, Bradford J, 2000. "Tools for Thought: What is New and Important about the "E-conomy"?," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt0c97w1gn, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    9. Laky, Teréz, 1998. "Változó fogalmak a munka változó világában [Changing notions in the changing world of labour]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 123-136.
    10. Unknown, 1987. "Book Reviews," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(03), pages 1-4, December.
    11. William M. Dugger, 1996. "The Mechanisms of Governance," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 1212-1216, December.
    12. L. J. Bourgeois, III & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 1988. "Strategic Decision Processes in High Velocity Environments: Four Cases in the Microcomputer Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(7), pages 816-835, July.
    13. Didier Chabaud, 2000. "Asset specificity, work organization and mode of command: first insights from the automotive industry," Chapters, in: Claude Ménard (ed.), Institutions, Contracts and Organizations, chapter 23, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Unknown, 1987. "Book Reviews," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 31(2), pages 1-8, August.
    15. Unknown, 1987. "Book Reviews," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 31(1), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sasvari, Peter, 2010. "The development of information and communication technology: An empirical study," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 76454, July.
    2. Massimo FLORIO & Emanuela SIRTORI, 2014. "The Evaluation of Research Infrastructures: a Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework," Departmental Working Papers 2014-10, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    3. Hallack, Michelle & Vazquez, Miguel, 2013. "European Union regulation of gas transmission services: Challenges in the allocation of network resources through entry/exit schemes," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 23-32.
    4. Haydar Akyazi & Seyfettin Artan, 2006. "Reflections of the New Economy on the Monetary Policy and Central Banking," Papers of the Annual IUE-SUNY Cortland Conference in Economics, in: Oguz Esen & Ayla Ogus (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Human and Economic Resources, pages 373-387, Izmir University of Economics.
    5. Argyres, Nicholas S. & Liebeskind, Julia Porter, 2002. "Governance inseparability and the evolution of US biotechnology industry," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 197-219, February.
    6. Iavor Marangozov, 2005. "From Practice to Theory of the International Joint Ventures," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 44-77.
    7. Yasemin Kor & Joseph Mahoney & Sharon Watson, 2008. "The effects of demand, competitive, and technological uncertainty on board monitoring and institutional ownership of IPO firms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 12(3), pages 239-259, August.
    8. Gonzalez-Diaz, Manuel & Arrunada, Benito & Fernandez, Alberto, 2000. "Causes of subcontracting: evidence from panel data on construction firms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 167-187, June.
    9. Sagren Moodley, 2002. "Competing in the Digital Economy?: The Dynamics and Impacts of B2B E-commerce on the South African Manufacturing Sector," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2002-79, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Wang, Sen & Bogle, Tim & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2012. "Forestry and the New Institutional Economics," Working Papers 130818, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    11. Xosé H. Vázquez, 2004. "Allocating Decision Rights on the Shop Floor: A Perspective from Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 463-480, August.
    12. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2011. "Appropriation, violent enforcement, and transaction costs: a critical survey," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 227-253, April.
    13. Stéphane Saussier, 2000. "Coûts de transaction et choix contractuels : un test économétrique sur une entreprise publique," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 145(4), pages 169-180.
    14. Lonsdale, Chris & Sanderson, Joe & Watson, Glyn & Peng, Fei, 2016. "Beyond intentional trust: supplier opportunism and management control mechanisms in public sector procurement and contracting," MPRA Paper 76094, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Bruno Carballa Smichowski, 2018. "The value of data: an analysis of closed-urban-data-based and open-data-based business models," Working Papers hal-01736484, HAL.
    16. Ivonne Audirac, 2005. "Information Technology and Urban Form: Challenges to Smart Growth," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 28(2), pages 119-145, April.
    17. Michael E. Sykuta, 2010. "Empirical Methods in Transaction Cost Economics," Chapters, in: Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics, chapter 16, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Bercovitz, Janet & Feldman, Maryann, 2011. "The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 81-93, February.
    19. Mikko Ketokivi & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2020. "Transaction Cost Economics As a Theory of Supply Chain Efficiency," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1011-1031, April.
    20. Coggan, Anthea & Buitelaar, Edwin & Whitten, Stuart & Bennett, Jeff, 2013. "Factors that influence transaction costs in development offsets: Who bears what and why?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 222-231.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J2 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor
    • J6 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.