IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/khe/journl/v8y2016i1p111-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Resilience in Romania

Author

Abstract

In this study we propose to evaluate the capacity of resilience of Romania as seen in reaction to the economic crisis. There are several studies about regional resilience, which focus on factors which improve the capacity of a region to respond to crisis or shocks and to recover and return to the previous state of equilibrium. In this approach, several factors are important, such as the capacity of an economy to be innovative and adaptive. We study regional resilience, and we also study relation of resilience to competitiveness or vulnerability. Resilience can be measured either by GDP evolution or the evolution of the unemployment rate. We focus here on evolution of GDP in Romania during crisis, showing that our country succeeded to recover with great difficulty and in a long period from the crisis, which proved a low resilience at national but also regional/county level. Therefore we must find innovative strategies to improve resilience if we want to face the challenges of the competing international economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ada Marinescu, 2016. "Regional Resilience in Romania," Knowledge Horizons - Economics, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 8(1), pages 111-117, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:111-117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/khe-vol8-nr1-2016/21.%20Ada%20Marinescu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/khe-vol8-nr1-2016/21.%20Ada%20Marinescu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gheorghe ZAMAN & Valentina VASILE, 2014. "Conceptual framework of economic resilience and vulnerability,at national and regional levels," Romanian Journal of Economics, Institute of National Economy, vol. 39(2(48)), pages 5-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mirela PANAIT & Irina RADULESCU & Catalin VOICA, 2018. "Financial Inclusion and Vulnerabilities Generated by the International Crisis," Romanian Journal of Economics, Institute of National Economy, vol. 47(2(56)), pages 71-81, Decembre.
    2. repec:fst:rfsisf:v:7:y:2022:i:13:p:120-131 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Jianu, Ionut, 2022. "Economic development and environmental degradation: A panel ARDL/PMG model for EU-27 countries," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(13), pages 120-131.
    4. Gheorghe H. Popescu & Violeta Sima & Elvira Nica & Ileana Georgiana Gheorghe, 2017. "Measuring Sustainable Competitiveness in Contemporary Economies—Insights from European Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Zaman, Gheorghe & Georgescu, George, 2015. "Resilience to crisis and GDP recovery at county level in Romania," MPRA Paper 63246, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Monica Mihaela MAER MATEI & Ana-Maria ZAMFIR & Cristina MOCANU, 2018. "Labour Market Resilience- Comparative Evidence From Romanian Counties," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 11, pages 59-66, July.
    7. Zenobia NICULITA, 2015. "Teachers' work style development as means of preventing their high staff turnover rates," Romanian Journal of Economics, Institute of National Economy, vol. 41(2(50)), pages 121-130, december.
    8. Ionut Jianu, 2022. "Economic development and environmental degradation: A panel ARDL/PMG model for EU-27 countries," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 13(7), pages 120-131, November.
    9. Marcela SLUSARCIUC, 2017. "Milestones for the resilience of the cross-border regions," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 9(3), pages 401-422, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:111-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adi Sava (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffucdro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.