IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/khe/journl/v2y2010i4p44-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Importance of the Cost Information in Making Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Gratiela Ghic

    ("Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University)

Abstract

This study insists on presenting the applicability of the multicriterial programming in the economic activity. Because the choosing of the final alternative is based on generating the set of nondominated points algorithm I created the software application package MCRIT (developed in C++) which allow us to generate the Nex set and also the choosing of final alternative using the method of ideal solution. The program was tested on small, medium and large systems and it allow us to obtain the set of nondominated points in a reasonable amount of time. This paper presents a case study which was solved with MCRIT package. Because the Nex set is to large I propose to limit it by imposing an acceptable threshold (an acceptable distance by the ideal solution) to that the variants are accepted by the decision maker. So became efficiently the use of ELECTRE method to determine the final solution. Moreover, besides the fact that the decision maker is moving in the space of reasonable solutions, it also could considerate the qualitative criterions which accompanying the reality of model and which couldn’t be surprised by the mathematical programming.

Suggested Citation

  • Gratiela Ghic, 2010. "The Importance of the Cost Information in Making Decisions," Knowledge Horizons - Economics, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 2(4), pages 44-50, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:2:y:2010:i:4:p:44-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/2010_khe_4_pdf/khe_vol_2_iss_4_44to50.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/2010_khe_4_pdf/khe_vol_2_iss_4_44to50.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. Korhonen, 1998. "Multiple Objective Programming Support," Working Papers ir98010, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A.P. Wierzbicki, 1998. "Reference Point Methods in Vector Optimization and Decision Support," Working Papers ir98017, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    2. Arbel, Ami & Korhonen, Pekka, 2001. "Using objective values to start multiple objective linear programming algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(3), pages 587-596, February.
    3. Guangquan Zhang & Jie Lu, 2003. "An Integrated Group Decision-Making Method Dealing with Fuzzy Preferences for Alternatives and Individual Judgments for Selection Criteria," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(6), pages 501-515, November.
    4. P. Korhonen & A. Siljamaeki & M. Soismaa, 1998. "Practical Aspects of Value Efficiency Analysis," Working Papers ir98042, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    5. Halme, Merja & Korhonen, Pekka, 2000. "Restricting weights in value efficiency analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 175-188, October.
    6. Tommi Gustafsson & Ahti Salo & Ramakrishnan Ramanathan, 2003. "Multicriteria methods for technology foresight," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2-3), pages 235-255.
    7. T. Joro, 1998. "Models for Identifying Target Units in Data Envelopment Analysis: Comparison and Extension," Working Papers ir98055, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    8. Francisco J. André & Inés Herrero & Laura Riesgo, 2004. "Using DEA to estimate the importance of objectives for decision makers," Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces E2004/50, Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
    9. Tarja Joro & Pekka Korhonen & Jyrki Wallenius, 1998. "Structural Comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis and Multiple Objective Linear Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(7), pages 962-970, July.
    10. P. Korhonen, 1997. "Searching the Efficient Frontier in Data Envelopment Analysis," Working Papers ir97079, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    11. Tiso, Annamaria & Dell'Orco, Mauro & Sassanelli, Domenico, 2010. "A community of agents as a tool to optimize industrial districts logistics," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 46, pages 36-51.
    12. Francisco J. André & Inés Herrero & Laura Riesgo, 2007. "Using a modified DEA model to estimate the importance of objectives. An application to agricultural economics," Working Papers 07.09, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    13. M.A. Quaddus & M.A.B. Siddique, 1994. "Multiobjective Decision Support in Development Planning," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 94-01, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    14. G. Fischer & M. Makowski & J. Antoine, 1996. "Multiple Criteria Land Use Analysis," Working Papers wp96006, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Multi-criteria analisys; MCRIT software;

    JEL classification:

    • C49 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:2:y:2010:i:4:p:44-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adi Sava (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffucdro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.