IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/theord/v71y2011i2p211-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic reasoning and time pressure: Transition from analytical operations to experiential responses

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Fraser-Mackenzie
  • Itiel Dror

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Fraser-Mackenzie & Itiel Dror, 2011. "Dynamic reasoning and time pressure: Transition from analytical operations to experiential responses," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 211-225, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:2:p:211-225
    DOI: 10.1007/s11238-009-9181-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11238-009-9181-z
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11238-009-9181-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gonzalez, Cleotilde & Dana, Jason & Koshino, Hideya & Just, Marcel, 2005. "The framing effect and risky decisions: Examining cognitive functions with fMRI," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Berthoz, Alain, 2006. "Emotion and Reason: The cognitive neuroscience of decision making," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198566274, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fraser-Mackenzie, P. & Sung, M. & Johnson, J.E.V., 2015. "The prospect of a perfect ending: Loss aversion and the round-number bias," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 67-80.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wardley, Marcus & Alberhasky, Max, 2021. "Framing zero: Why losing nothing is better than gaining nothing," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Arts, Sara & Ong, Qiyan & Qiu, Jianying, 2020. "Measuring subjective decision confidence," MPRA Paper 117907, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Maria Ishaque, 2021. "Managing Conflict of Interests in Professional Accounting Firms: A Research Synthesis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 537-555, March.
    4. Daniel Wall & Raymond D. Crookes & Eric J. Johnson & Elke U. Weber, 2020. "Risky choice frames shift the structure and emotional valence of internal arguments: A query theory account of the unusual disease problem," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(5), pages 685-703, September.
    5. Murong Yang & Laurence S. J. Roope & James Buchanan & Arthur E. Attema & Philip M. Clarke & A. Sarah Walker & Sarah Wordsworth, 2022. "Eliciting risk preferences that predict risky health behavior: A comparison of two approaches," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 836-858, May.
    6. Manel Baucells & Antonio Villasís, 2010. "Stability of risk preferences and the reflection effect of prospect theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 193-211, February.
    7. Valeria Faralla & Alessandro Innocenti & Eva Venturini, 2013. "Risk Taking and Social Exposure," Labsi Experimental Economics Laboratory University of Siena 046, University of Siena.
    8. John F. McCarthy & Carl A. Scheraga & Donald E. Gibson, 2010. "Culture, Cognition and Conflict: How Neuroscience Can Help to Explain Cultural Differences in Negotiation and Conflict Management," Chapters, in: Angela A. Stanton & Mellani Day & Isabell M. Welpe (ed.), Neuroeconomics and the Firm, chapter 14, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Solnais, Céline & Andreu-Perez, Javier & Sánchez-Fernández, Juan & Andréu-Abela, Jaime, 2013. "The contribution of neuroscience to consumer research: A conceptual framework and empirical review," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 68-81.
    10. Mina Ličen & Sergeja Slapničar, 2022. "Can process accountability mitigate myopic biases? An experimental analysis," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-26, March.
    11. Isao Shoji & Sumei Kanehiro, 2012. "Intertemporal dynamic choice under myopia for reward and different risk tolerances," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 50(1), pages 85-98, May.
    12. Christian Hofmann & Hans-Ulrich Küpper, 2011. "Neurobiologie und Unternehmensrechnung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 63(63), pages 168-196, January.
    13. Casado-Aranda, Luis-Alberto & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Sánchez-Fernández, Juan, 2018. "A Neuropsychological Study on How Consumers Process Risky and Secure E-payments," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 151-164.
    14. Toke Reinholt Fosgaard & Lars Gårn Hansen & Erik Wengström, 2017. "Framing and Misperception in Public Good Experiments," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 119(2), pages 435-456, April.
    15. Böhm, Robert & Theelen, Maik M.P., 2016. "Outcome valence and externality valence framing in public good dilemmas," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 151-163.
    16. Delphine Boutin & Laurène Petifour & Haris Megzari, 2022. "Instability of preferences due to Covid-19 Crisis and emotions: a natural experiment from urban Burkina Faso," Working Papers hal-03623601, HAL.
    17. Choongbeom Choi & Miyoung Jeong, 2020. "The Impact of Service Firm’s Environmentally Friendly Reputation in the Context of Revenue Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-12, August.
    18. Annabel B Losecaat Vermeer & Alan G Sanfey, 2015. "The Effect of Positive and Negative Feedback on Risk-Taking across Different Contexts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    19. Roberto Dell'Anno & Vincenzo Maria De Rosa, 2013. "The Relevance of the Theory of Fiscal Illusion. The Case of the Italian Tax System," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(2), pages 63-92.
    20. Kaczmarek Aleksander & Przybyszewski Krzysztof & Rutkowska Dorota & Sosnowska Honorata, 2018. "The impact of mathematical competences and cognitive effort on the appearance of the framing effect," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 4(2), pages 64-79, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:2:p:211-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.