IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/sbusec/v6y1994i5p381-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Reconciliation of the Unemployment--New Firm Startup Paradox

Author

Listed:
  • Audretsch, David
  • Jin, Jim

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to reconcile the seeming paradox emerging in the literature relating unemployment to new-firm startup activity and the decision to enter into self-employment. On the one hand time series studies have generally found that entrepreneurship is promoted by high levels of unemployment. On the other hand, cross-sectional studies have generally found that startup activity tends to be depressed where unemployment is high. We present a model derived from Knight's theory of individual choice in order to reconcile this apparent paradox. Assuming presence of an economy-wide demand shock and industry-specific shocks, the model indeed predicts the relations between new firm startup and unemployment which are found in empirical analysis. Hence, instead of blaming specification errors or unobserved policy changes, the seeming paradox can be reconciled by solid economic theory. Copyright 1994 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Audretsch, David & Jin, Jim, 1994. "A Reconciliation of the Unemployment--New Firm Startup Paradox," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 6(5), pages 381-385, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:6:y:1994:i:5:p:381-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Carree, 2002. "Does Unemployment Affect the Number of Establishments? A Regional Analysis for US States," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 389-398.
    2. Barbara Orser & Sandy Hogarth-Scott, 1998. "Case analysis of Canadian self--employment assistance programming-super-1," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 51-69, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:6:y:1994:i:5:p:381-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.