An important reason for the establishment of the U.K. Unlisted Securities Market was to provide capital for promising small firms. This paper makes two comparisons: (1) between selected financial characteristics of a sample of small firms that took advantage of this opportunity and a sample of firms that did not; and (2) between any differences in these characteristics and those between a sample of small firms that were floated on the Stock Market between 1970-73 and a sample of small firms that remained unfloated. Probit was employed. The results suggest floated firms were on average more profitable and faster growing, though with the latter relationship not particularly strong. There was little significant difference in gearing or liquidity. The owners of floated firms were prepared to take less remuneration than average during the 1970s but not during the 1980s. Copyright 1993 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Volume (Year): 5 (1993) Issue (Month): 3 (September) Pages: 207-14 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Did you know? Citation analysis on IDEAS includes online papers that are freely accessible and whose text could be automatically analyzed, currently about 210000 papers.