Van Dijk et al. found different results for some variables explaining the large/small firm innovation advantage in a number of Acs and Audretsch publications. Their own research adds to this variety. However, the differences van Dijk et al. found between the Acs and Audretsch studies can be largely attributed to specification and sample differences. The same applies to the observed differences between Acs and Audretsch and van Dijk et al. Copyright 1998 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 11 (1998) Issue (Month): 4 (December) Pages: 391-93 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)