IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/rqfnac/v43y2014i4p855-860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is higher variance necessarily bad for investment?

Author

Listed:
  • Shlomo Yitzhaki
  • Peter Lambert

Abstract

We consider decision-making under risk in which random events affect the value of the portfolio multiplicatively, rather than additively. In this case, a higher variability in the rate of return not only is associated with a higher risk, a bad property, but also engenders a higher expected return, a good property. As a result, certain expected utility maximizing investors, namely those with the lowest risk aversion, will prefer some portfolios with higher variances in the rate of return over others with lower ones. This is demonstrated, and implications are considered. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Shlomo Yitzhaki & Peter Lambert, 2014. "Is higher variance necessarily bad for investment?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 855-860, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:43:y:2014:i:4:p:855-860
    DOI: 10.1007/s11156-013-0395-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11156-013-0395-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11156-013-0395-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick L. Brockett & Yehuda Kahane, 1992. "Risk, Return, Skewness and Preference," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 851-866, June.
    2. Haim Shalit & Shlomo Yitzhaki, 2010. "How does beta explain stochastic dominance efficiency?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 431-444, November.
    3. Levy, Haim & Schwarz, Gideon, 1997. "Correlation and the time interval over which the variables are measured," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1-2), pages 341-350.
    4. Shlomo Yitzhaki, 1987. "The Relation between Return and Income," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 102(1), pages 77-95.
    5. Shlomo Yitzhaki, 2003. "Gini’s Mean difference: a superior measure of variability for non-normal distributions," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(2), pages 285-316.
    6. Hawawini, Gabriel & Vora, Ashok, 1981. "The capital asset pricing model and the investment horizon: Comment," MPRA Paper 44904, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Levhari, David & Levy, Haim, 1981. "The Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Investment Horizon: Reply," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 63(4), pages 637-638, November.
    8. Alex Huang, 2013. "Value at risk estimation by quantile regression and kernel estimator," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 225-251, August.
    9. Levy, Haim, 1973. "Stochastic Dominance Among Log-Normal Prospects," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 14(3), pages 601-614, October.
    10. Shlomo Yitzhaki & Peter Lambert, 2013. "The relationship between the absolute deviation from a quantile and Gini’s mean difference," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 71(2), pages 97-104, September.
    11. Haim Levy & Ilan Guttman & Isabel Tkatch, 2001. "Regression, Correlation, and the Time Interval: Additive-Multiplicative Framework," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(8), pages 1150-1159, August.
    12. Levhari, David & Levy, Haim, 1977. "The Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Investment Horizon," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 59(1), pages 92-104, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gleb Gersman & Haim Shalit, 2014. "Optimizing MCSD Portfolios," Working Papers 1410, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    2. Lambert, Peter J. & Yitzhaki, Shlomo, 2015. "Accounting for variability in the growth rate of income," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 71-73.
    3. Betül Çal & Mary Lambkin, 2017. "Brand equity of stock exchange as a mediator in financial decisions," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 14-23, March.
    4. Zeeshan Ahmed & Shahid Rasool & Qasim Saleem & Mubashir Ali Khan & Shamsa Kanwal, 2022. "Mediating Role of Risk Perception Between Behavioral Biases and Investor’s Investment Decisions," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    5. Shlomo Yitzhaki, 2015. "Gini’s mean difference offers a response to Leamer’s critique," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 73(1), pages 31-43, April.
    6. Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih & Ibrahim A. Elshaer, 2023. "Risk-Taking, Financial Knowledge, and Risky Investment Intention: Expanding Theory of Planned Behavior Using a Moderating-Mediating Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. R Jea & C-T Su & J-L Lin, 2005. "Time aggregation effect on the correlation coefficient: added-systematically sampled framework," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(11), pages 1303-1309, November.
    2. Moshe Levy, 2012. "On the Spurious Correlation Between Sample Betas and Mean Returns," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 341-360, September.
    3. Jea, Rong & Lin, Jin-Lung & Su, Chao-Ton, 2005. "Correlation and the time interval in multiple regression models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 433-441, April.
    4. Edna Schechtman & Amit Shelef, 2018. "Correlation and the time interval over which the variables are measured – A non-parametric approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-9, November.
    5. Ndéné Ka & Stéphane Mussard, 2016. "ℓ 1 regressions: Gini estimators for fixed effects panel data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 1436-1446, June.
    6. Haim Levy & Ilan Guttman & Isabel Tkatch, 2001. "Regression, Correlation, and the Time Interval: Additive-Multiplicative Framework," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(8), pages 1150-1159, August.
    7. Téa Ouraga, 2019. "A note on Gini Principal Component Analysis," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(2), pages 1076-1083.
    8. Ndene Ka & Stephane Mussard, 2015. "l1 Regressions: Gini Estimators for Fixed Effects Panel Data," Cahiers de recherche 15-02, Departement d'économique de l'École de gestion à l'Université de Sherbrooke.
    9. George G. Kaufman, 1980. "Duration, Planning Period, And Tests Of The Capital Asset Pricing Model," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-9, March.
    10. Plischke, Elmar & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2019. "Copula theory and probabilistic sensitivity analysis: Is there a connection?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1046-1059.
    11. Charles Condevaux & Stéphane Mussard & Téa Ouraga & Guillaume Zambrano, 2020. "Generalized Gini linear and quadratic discriminant analyses," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 78(2), pages 219-236, August.
    12. Laura Alfaro & Nicholas Bloom & Paola Conconi & Harald Fadinger & Patrick Legros & Andrew F. Newman & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2017. "Come Together: Firm Boundaries and Delegation," Harvard Business School Working Papers 18-051, Harvard Business School, revised May 2019.
    13. Semenov, Andrei, 2021. "Measuring the stock's factor beta and identifying risk factors under market inefficiency," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 635-649.
    14. Michel M. Denuit & Louis Eeckhoudt, 2010. "A General Index of Absolute Risk Attitude," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 712-715, April.
    15. Liu, Liping, 1999. "Approximate portfolio analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 35-49, November.
    16. Mamadou-Diéne Diop & Jules Sadefo Kamdem, 2023. "Multiscale Agricultural Commodities Forecasting Using Wavelet-SARIMA Process," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 21(1), pages 1-40, March.
    17. Chenglu Jin & Thomas Conlon & John Cotter, 2023. "Co-Skewness across Return Horizons," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(5), pages 1483-1518.
    18. Erwin M. Saniga & Thomas H. McInish & Bruce K. Gouldey, 1981. "The Effect Of Differencing Interval Length On Beta," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 4(2), pages 129-135, June.
    19. Fischer, Thomas & Lundtofte, Frederik, 2020. "Unequal returns: Using the Atkinson index to measure financial risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    20. Briec, Walter & Kerstens, Kristiaan, 2010. "Portfolio selection in multidimensional general and partial moment space," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 636-656, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risk; Uncertainty; Portfolio choice; D81; G11; D31;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:43:y:2014:i:4:p:855-860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.