Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Why should Austrian economists be pluralists?

Contents:

Author Info

  • Robert Garnett

    ()

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    No abstract is available for this item.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11138-010-0111-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Springer in its journal The Review of Austrian Economics.

    Volume (Year): 24 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 1 (March)
    Pages: 29-42

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:24:y:2011:i:1:p:29-42

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.springerlink.com/link.asp?id=100335

    Related research

    Keywords: Pluralism; Marketplace of ideas; Republic of science; Epistemic virtue; Weingast paradox; Adam Smith; Academic freedom; A20; B40; B53;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Robert Garnett, 2006. "Paradigms and pluralism in heterodox economics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 521-546.
    2. Harpham, Edward J., 2000. "The Problem of Liberty in the thought of Adam Smith," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(02), pages 217-237, June.
    3. McCloskey, Donald N, 1983. "The Rhetoric of Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 481-517, June.
    4. Rutherford, Malcolm, 2000. "The Prospects of Heterodox Economics: a Comment," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(02), pages 185-188, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:24:y:2011:i:1:p:29-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Guenther Eichhorn) or (Christopher F. Baum).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.