IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/policy/v38y2005i2p159-176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The fertile soil for policy learning

Author

Listed:
  • Janet Frantz
  • Hajime Sato

Abstract

Early in the 20th century, both Japan and the United States adopted isolation as the primary policy for leprosy victims. Medical science had, by mid-century, arrived at a near consensus that isolation was inappropriate. This new information filtered into the policy making soil of both nations and slowly led to the abandonment of isolation. Conceptualizations from the literature offer the bases of a policy learning model centered on the characteristics of a fertile soil for policy learning. The model considers the nature of the problem, the nature of the information, and the nature of the debate as critical factors shaping the learning of new information. Each factor added to the understanding. The problem, complex and characterized by negatively constructed targets, was not amenable to policy learning, especially in Japan with more victims, more hospitals, more researchers, and more stigmatization. It took considerable time to wrap the information in scientific integrity. In Japan the process was slowed by the war which separated researchers from professional fora at a critical time. Head on, confrontational debates in both nations failed. Success came only when strategies that moderated debate were adopted. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Suggested Citation

  • Janet Frantz & Hajime Sato, 2005. "The fertile soil for policy learning," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 38(2), pages 159-176, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:policy:v:38:y:2005:i:2:p:159-176
    DOI: 10.1007/s11077-005-2563-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11077-005-2563-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11077-005-2563-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sato, Hajime & Narita, Minoru, 2003. "Politics of leprosy segregation in Japan: the emergence, transformation and abolition of the patient segregation policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 2529-2539, June.
    2. John Dixon & Rhys Dogan, 2004. "The Conduct of Policy Analysis: Philosophical Points of Reference," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 21(4), pages 559-579, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niyi Awofeso, 2011. "Leprosy: International Public Health Policies and Public Health Eras," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Alex Osei‐Kojo & Paul Lawer Kenney & Clement Mensah Damoah & Albert Ahenkan, 2022. "Collective learning and COVID‐19 mitigation in Ghana," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(3), pages 255-281, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Dixon, 2012. "On being Poor‐by‐Choice: A Philosophical Critique of the Neoliberal Poverty Perspective," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), pages 1-19, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:policy:v:38:y:2005:i:2:p:159-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.