IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v96y2010i1p11-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dealing with Wicked Issues: Open Strategizing and the Camisea Case

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Schmitt

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Schmitt, 2010. "Dealing with Wicked Issues: Open Strategizing and the Camisea Case," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 11-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:96:y:2010:i:1:p:11-19
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0938-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10551-011-0938-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-011-0938-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Newell, Stephen J. & Goldsmith, Ronald E., 2001. "The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 235-247, June.
    2. Callon, M. & Laredo, P. & Rabeharisoa, V. & Gonard, T. & Leray, T., 1992. "The management and evaluation of technological programs and the dynamics of techno-economic networks: The case of the AFME," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 215-236, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna Radomska & Aleksandra Szpulak & Przemysław Wołczek, 2023. "A multi-item scale for open strategy measurement," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 50(1), pages 51-71, March.
    2. Nathalie Aubourg & Béatrice Canel-Depitre & Corinne Renault-Tesson, 2012. "La RSE en question : La gouvernance des parties prenantes au service de la gouvernance d'entreprise," Post-Print hal-02332385, HAL.
    3. Nathalie Aubourg & Corinne Renault-Tesson, 2011. "Learning how to implement a French firm's CSR policy in an emerging country," Post-Print hal-02332455, HAL.
    4. Katharina Kaupke & Dodo zu Knyphausen‐Aufseß, 2023. "Sustainability and firm value in the oil and gas industry—A vicious circle?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1129-1144, May.
    5. Leonhard Dobusch & David Seidl & Felix Werle, 2015. "Opening up the strategy-making process: Comparing open strategy to open innovation," Working Papers 359, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    6. Edwin Rühli & Sybille Sachs & Ruth Schmitt & Thomas Schneider, 2017. "Innovation in Multistakeholder Settings: The Case of a Wicked Issue in Health Care," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 289-305, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Venus Jin & Aziz Muqaddam, 2019. "Product placement 2.0: “Do Brands Need Influencers, or Do Influencers Need Brands?”," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(5), pages 522-537, September.
    2. Sarstedt, Marko & Wilczynski, Petra & Melewar, T.C., 2013. "Measuring reputation in global markets—A comparison of reputation measures’ convergent and criterion validities," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 329-339.
    3. Brühl, Rolf & Basel, Jörn S. & Kury, Max F., 2018. "Communication after an integrity-based trust violation: How organizational account giving affects trust," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 161-170.
    4. Andrea Pérez & Ignacio Rodríguez del Bosque, 2015. "How Customer Support for Corporate Social Responsibility Influences the Image of Companies: Evidence from the Banking Industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 155-168, May.
    5. Carroll, Ryall & Kachersky, Luke, 2019. "Service fundraising and the role of perceived donation efficacy in individual charitable giving," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 254-263.
    6. Farah Mastura Noor Azman & Zainol Bidin, 2015. "Factors Influencing Zakat Compliance Behavior on Saving," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 5(1), pages 118-128, January.
    7. Guido Berens & Cees Riel & Johan Rekom, 2007. "The CSR-Quality Trade-Off: When can Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Ability Compensate Each Other?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 233-252, September.
    8. Steinmueller, W. Edward, 2010. "Economics of Technology Policy," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1181-1218, Elsevier.
    9. Penan, H., 1996. "R & D strategy in a techno-economic network: Alzheimer's disease therapeutic strategies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 337-358, May.
    10. Malshe, Avinash, 2010. "How is marketers' credibility construed within the sales-marketing interface?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 13-19, January.
    11. Astrachan, Claudia Binz & Patel, Vijay K. & Wanzenried, Gabrielle, 2014. "A comparative study of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for theory development in family firm research," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 116-128.
    12. Kinder, Tony, 2003. "Go with the flow--a conceptual framework for supply relations in the era of the extended enterprise," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 503-523, March.
    13. Hemert, P. van & Nijkamp, P., 2008. "Thematic research prioritization in the EU and the Netherlands: an assessment on the basis of content analysis," Serie Research Memoranda 0023, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    14. Mo Ran Yi, 2023. "Corporate Reputation and Users’ Behavioral Intentions: Is Reputation the Master Key That Moves Consumers?," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    15. Katie Angliss, 2022. "An Alternative Approach to Measuring University Reputation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(1), pages 33-49, February.
    16. Silvia Cruz & Sônia Paulino & Faïz Gallouj, 2015. "Public Service Innovation: Solid Waste Sector from the Perspective of Clean Development Mechanism Landfill Projects," Post-Print halshs-01247615, HAL.
    17. Balboni, Bernardo, 2008. "Perceived corporate credibility as the emergent property of corporate reputation’s transmission process," MPRA Paper 7944, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Contreras-Pacheco, Orlando E., 2017. "Image, Credibility and Reputation: Perceptions of Deceitful Corporate Communication in the Classroom," MPRA Paper 89207, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Md. Uzir Hossain Uzir & Abu Bakar Abdul Hamid & Ishraq Jerin & Ahmad Shaharudin Abdul Latiff & Ramayah Thurasamy, 2021. "Customer satisfaction and brand loyalty to electronic home appliances in Bangladesh: the contingent role of brand trust," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(6), pages 1-35, June.
    20. Anne Michaels & Michael Grüning, 2016. "Interne Treiber von CSR-Publizität: Der Einfluss von Corporate Identity," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 315-324, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:96:y:2010:i:1:p:11-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.