IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/enreec/v8y1996i4p473-483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fresh surface water resource allocation between Bulgaria and Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitrios Giannias
  • Joseph Lekakis

Abstract

This paper addresses the important issue of transboundary sharing of fresh surface water resources, including quantity and quality dimensions. It carves a simple economic model of the benefits which can be generated by maximizing the joint profits earned, when the resource is shared efficiently between two countries. The appropriate policy instrument towards this end is a bilateral agreement to charge the same water price to all water users in a given sector. Market clearance will then follow to determine the optimal water price. The case of the Nestos river flowing through Bulgaria and Greece, but overexploited by Bulgaria, in the Balkans is used as a case study. The empirical estimation of a fixed proportions production function for corn derives a marginal water value of the Nestos water for Greece. This value, which applies under the current non-cooperative solution, is higher than the optimal water price in the cooperative solution. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitrios Giannias & Joseph Lekakis, 1996. "Fresh surface water resource allocation between Bulgaria and Greece," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 8(4), pages 473-483, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:enreec:v:8:y:1996:i:4:p:473-483
    DOI: 10.1007/BF00357415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF00357415
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF00357415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dinar, Ariel & Wolf, Aaron, 1994. "International Markets for Water and the Potential for Regional Cooperation: Economic and Political Perspectives in the Western Middle East," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(1), pages 43-66, October.
    2. Whelan, S., 1991. "Property Rights, Pareto Efficiency and Water Sharing Arrangements for The River Murray," Papers 91-15, New South Wales - School of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Houba, Harold & van der Laan, Gerard & Zeng, Yuyu, 2014. "Asymmetric Nash Solutions in the River Sharing Problem," Strategic Behavior and the Environment, now publishers, vol. 4(4), pages 321-360, December.
    2. D. Kilgour & Ariel Dinar, 2001. "Flexible Water Sharing within an International River Basin," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 18(1), pages 43-60, January.
    3. Ekin Birol & Phoebe Koundouri & Yiannis Kountouris, 2008. "Using Economic Valuation Techniques to Inform Water Resources Management in the Southern European, Mediterranean and Developing Countries: A Survey and Critical Appraisal of Available Techniques," DEOS Working Papers 0806, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    4. Abraham, Anand & Ramachandran, Parthasarathy, 2021. "The welfare implications of transboundary storage and dam ownership on river water trade," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 18-27.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gohar, Abdelaziz A. & Ward, Frank A., 2010. "Gains from expanded irrigation water trading in Egypt: An integrated basin approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2535-2548, October.
    2. Petra Hellegers & Ekko van Ierland, 2003. "Policy Instruments for Groundwater Management in the Netherlands," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 26(1), pages 163-172, September.
    3. D. Kilgour & Ariel Dinar, 2001. "Flexible Water Sharing within an International River Basin," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 18(1), pages 43-60, January.
    4. Claudia W. Sadoff & Dale Whittington & David Grey, 2002. "Africa's International Rivers : An Economic Perspective," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15175, December.
    5. Mehmet Kucukmehmetoglu & Abdurrahman Geymen, 2012. "Transboundary Water Resources Allocation Under Various Parametric Conditions: The Case Of The Euphrates & Tigris River Basin," ERSA conference papers ersa12p613, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Bhaduri, Anik & Barbier, E., 2008. "Linking rivers in the Ganges-Brahmaputra River Basin: exploring the transboundary effects," Conference Papers h041813, International Water Management Institute.
    7. Wang, Yuntong, 2011. "Trading water along a river," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 124-130, March.
    8. Mehmet Kucukmehmetoglu, 2011. "Energy And Agricultural Policies Over The Transboundary Surface Water Resources," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1183, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Bielsa, Jorge & Duarte, Rosa, 2001. "An economic model for water allocation in North Eastern Spain," MPRA Paper 36729, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Rafael Emmanuel Macatangay & Alistair Rieu-Clarke, 2018. "The role of valuation and bargaining in optimising transboundary watercourse treaty regimes," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 409-428, June.
    11. Kim Hang Pham Do, 2014. "The Role of Issue Linkage in Managing the Mekong," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2014-164, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Bielsa, Jorge & Duarte, Rosa, 2003. "Modelling water resource allocation: a case study on agriculture versus hydropower production," MPRA Paper 36923, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Sarah Acquah & Frank A. Ward, 2017. "Optimizing Adjustments to Transboundary Water Sharing Plans: A Multi-Basin Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(15), pages 5019-5042, December.
    14. Yinglan Xue & Yan Chen & Dan Cui & Yuxi Xie & Weihua Zeng & Jing Zhang, 2019. "Monthly Allocation of Water Resources and Pollutant Loads in a Basin Based on the Water Footprint and Fallback Bargaining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-23, December.
    15. KLAUS ABBINK & MOLLER, Lars Christian & SARAH O'HARA, 2005. "The Syr Darya River Conflict: An Experimental Case Study," Discussion Papers 2005-14, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    16. Mehmet Kucukmehmetoglu & Jean-Michel Guldmann, 2005. "Multi-Objective Programming for the Allocation of Trans-Boundary Water Resources - the Case of the Euphrates and Tigris," ERSA conference papers ersa05p9, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Pham Do, Kim Hang & Dinar, Ariel & McKinney, Daene, 2011. "Can issue linkage help mitigate externalities and enhance cooperation," MPRA Paper 37408, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Ert, Eyal & Cohen-Amin, Shier & Dinar, Ariel, 2019. "The effect of issue linkage on cooperation in bilateral conflicts: An experimental analysis," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 134-142.
    19. Dimitrios Giannias, 1997. "Marginal values of water quantity and quality variations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 337-346, November.
    20. Dinar, Ariel & Wolf, Aaron T., 1997. "Economic And Political Considerations In Regional Cooperation Models," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:enreec:v:8:y:1996:i:4:p:473-483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.