IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v16y2000i3p237-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detection of Spurious Maxima through Random Draw Tests and Specification Tests

Author

Listed:
  • Robert E. Dorsey
  • Walter J. Mayer

Abstract

Consistent estimation requires finding the global maximum of some specified objective function. Local maxima are often easy to find, but do not necessarily yield consistent estimates. In many nonlinear applications, the researcher can rarely be certain that a found local maximum is global. This paper examines the ability of random draw tests and specification tests to detect spurious maxima. For random draw tests we analyze Veall (1990) and a test introduced here based on a generalized beta distribution. Specification tests routinely used by researchers are also examined as methods for detecting spurious maxima. Monte Carlo results are reported on various test functions. The results suggest that specification testa are more useful than the random draw tests for detecting spurious maxima.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert E. Dorsey & Walter J. Mayer, 2000. "Detection of Spurious Maxima through Random Draw Tests and Specification Tests," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 16(3), pages 237-256, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:16:y:2000:i:3:p:237-256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0927-7099/contents
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:16:y:2000:i:3:p:237-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.