The authors show how the transformation loci in the specific factors model (capital specificity) and the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model (capital mobility) can be rigorously derived and easily compared by using geometric techniques on the basis of Savosnick geometry. The approach shows directly that the transformation locus with capital specificity has a greater degree of curvature than with capital mobility, given the same technology, and that the latter is an envelope of the former. It can also be used to show how incentives in the short run would lead to the long-run capital reallocation implied by the assumption of capital mobility.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Andrew Ivers) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Andrew Ivers to update the entry or send us the correct address..
Find related papers by JEL classification: A2 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics D5 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium F1 - International Economics - - Trade
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: