Timothy Dittmer () (Central Washington University)
Abstract
Many introductory microeconomics textbook authors derive the law of demand from the assumption of diminishing marginal utility. Authors of intermediate and graduate textbooks derive demand from diminishing marginal rate of substitution and ordinal preferences. These approaches are not interchangeable; diminishing marginal utility for all goods is neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for diminishing marginal rate of substitution, and the assumption of diminishing marginal utility is inconsistent with the assumption of ordinal preferences. In this article, the author argues that demand curves should not be derived from diminishing marginal utility in introductory textbooks and suggests that introductory text authors begin their treatment of demand with diminishing marginal value.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Andrew Ivers) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Andrew Ivers to update the entry or send us the correct address..
Find related papers by JEL classification: A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate B21 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Microeconomics D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles