There is a difference between the private and social cost of preserving the past. Although it may be privately rational to forget the past, the social cost is significant: We fail to see that classical political economy is analytically egalitarian. The past is a rich source of surprises and debates, and resources on the Web are uniquely suited to teaching such wide-ranging debates. Our Secret History of the Dismal Science, at www.econlib.org, provides a series of windows on the literary and analytical texts and the artwork that figured in the debates. Students who read Smith juxtaposed with Whitman, who read the Carlyle-Mill exchange, and who see these images, understand the debate in a way that students who read only the Wealth of Nations, Ricardo’s Principles, or John Stuart Mill cannot.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Andrew Ivers) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Andrew Ivers to update the entry or send us the correct address..
Find related papers by JEL classification: A20 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - General B10 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - General D62 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Externalities
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: