The authors study the biases that are likely to arise in practice with panel data when parameters vary across individuals, but this is not allowed for in estimation. They consider both stationary and non-stationary regressors. They find that biases can be severe for relatively small parameter variation, and that this problem is hard to detect. They study in some detail by Monte-Carlo the performance of the T. Anderson-C. Hsiao estimator in the presence of this particular mis-specification. Copyright 1992 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 7 (1992) Issue (Month): 2 (April-June) Pages: 175-89 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Other versions of this item:
Paper
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.) This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.