Kommunale Arbeitsmarktpolitik - Verschiebebahnhof oder Ausweg aus der Sozialhilfeabhängigkeit?
AbstractDue to an increasing fiscal burden by welfare payments, municipalities tend more and more to initiate employment and training programs under their own responsibility besides the Federal Labor Agency. However, critics object that this might predominantly be viewed as an attempt to shift fiscal burdens to the Federal Labor Agency rather than a policy option towards labor market integration of low-wage workers. In order to investigate this issue, the IWH carried out a country-wide survey within twelve municipalities and rural districts. The sample comprises 200 employable welfare recipients, among them participants of labor market programs as well as a reference group of non-participants. The results of the IWH welfare survey are at best suggesting a moderate success of program participation with regard to labor market integration. Nevertheless, the programs appear to be profitable for municipalities, since they succeed in bringing participants out of welfare dependency. In many cases, however, welfare is replaced by unemployment support, which means that only the fiscal responsibility changes. A shortcoming of the results has to be seen in the fact that municipalities tend to assign especially those people for program participation, who are already better fitting into requirements of the labor market. This seriously impairs the comparability of participants and non-participants. In view of the remarkable amount of expenditures it seems therefore advisable to put more attention on the effectiveness of the programs than has been done in the past. This could be achieved by a stronger orientation towards an experimental design of assignment for program participation.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Halle Institute for Economic Research in its journal Wirtschaft im Wandel.
Volume (Year): 7 (2001)
Issue (Month): 11 ()
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Tobias Henning).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.