IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ipf/finteo/v33y2009i2p219-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pre-filled Income Tax Returns: Reducing Compliance Costs for Personal Income Taxpayers in Slovenia

Author

Listed:
  • Maja Klun

    (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration)

Abstract

Simplifying procedures and improving legislation generally lead to a reduction in the compliance costs. The introduction of pre-filled tax returns clearly simplifies the tax compliance procedure. Before the introduction of pre-filled tax returns for personal income taxpayers in Slovenia, tax legislation was also modified. This paper presents the results of research into the compliance costs for personal income taxpayers before and after the simplification of the compliance procedure in Slovenia, irrespective of tax legislation itself not being simplified. The results indicate that pre-filled tax returns reduce compliance costs for personal income taxpayers by around 73%. Nevertheless, this is only a tentative estimate, since several assumptions are taken into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Maja Klun, 2009. "Pre-filled Income Tax Returns: Reducing Compliance Costs for Personal Income Taxpayers in Slovenia," Financial Theory and Practice, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 33(2), pages 219-233.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipf:finteo:v:33:y:2009:i:2:p:219-233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ijf.hr/eng/FTP/2009/2/klun.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maja Klun & Helena Blazi´c, 2005. "Tax Compliance Costs for Companies in Slovenia and Croatia," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 61(3), pages 418-437, November.
    2. Maja Klun, 2004. "Compliance Costs for Personal Income Tax in a Transition Country: The Case of Slovenia," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 25(1), pages 93-104, March.
    3. Tran-Nam, Binh & Evans, Chris & Walpole, Michael & Ritchie, Katherine, 2000. "Tax Compliance Costs: Research Methodology and Empirical Evidence from Australia," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 53(n. 2), pages 229-52, June.
    4. Leoš Vitek & Jan Pavel & Jana Krbova, 2004. "Effectiveness of the Czech Tax System," Baltic Journal of Economics, Baltic International Centre for Economic Policy Studies, vol. 4(2), pages 55-71, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jagrič Timotej & Lešnik Tomaž & Grbenic Stefan O. & Jagrič Vita, 2019. "The Fulfilment of Tax Obligation in Case of Slovenian Tax Residents Working in Other Countries," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 65(4), pages 27-34, December.
    2. Kay Blaufus & Frank Hechtner & Janine K. Jarzembski, 2019. "The Income Tax Compliance Costs of Private Households: Empirical Evidence from Germany," Public Finance Review, , vol. 47(5), pages 925-966, September.
    3. Mitja Čok & Jože Sambt & Marko Košak & Miroslav Verbič & Boris Majcen, 2011. "Distribution of personal income tax changes in Slovenia," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 503-515, November.
    4. Martin Fochmann & Frank Hechtner & Tobias Kölle & Michael Overesch, 2021. "Combating overreporting of deductions in tax returns: prefilling and restricting the deductibility of expenditures," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(7), pages 935-964, September.
    5. Fochmann, Martin & Müller, Nadja & Overesch, Michael, 2018. "Less cheating? The effects of prefilled forms on compliance behavior," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 227, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Eichfelder & François Vaillancourt, 2014. "Tax Compliance Costs: A Review of Cost Burdens and Cost Structures," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 210(3), pages 111-148, September.
    2. Juraj Nemec & Ladislav Pompura & Vladimír Šagát, 2015. "Administrative Costs of Taxation in Slovakia," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(2), pages 51-61.
    3. Burak Emil & Nemec Juraj, 2016. "Main Factors Determining the Slovak Tax System Performance," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 185-197, December.
    4. S. Vishnuhadevi, 2021. "Administrative and Compliance Costs of Value Added Tax (VAT): A Review," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 26(2), pages 179-206, December.
    5. S. Vishnuhadevi & D. Hima Bindu, 2022. "Compliance Costs of GST for Small Business Enterprises in Tamil Nadu," Working Papers 2022-229, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    6. Jan Pavel & Leoš Vítek, 2015. "Vyvolané náklady daňového systému v ČR [Compliance Costs of the Czech Tax System]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(3), pages 317-330.
    7. Žiga Kotnik & Maja Klun & Renata Slabe-Erker, 2020. "Identification of the Factors That Affect the Environmental Administrative Burden for Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Sacchidananda Mukherjee & Shivani Badola, 2022. "Estimation of VAT compliance costs of unincorporated enterprises in India: unit-level analysis," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 421-441, December.
    9. Emmanuel Eneche Onoja & Ademu Usman Odoma, 2021. "Assessing the Effect of Tax Administration on Smes Tax Compliance Level in Kogi State," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 7, July -Dec.
    10. Matthias Mors & Anne Bucher & Katri Kosonen & Philippe Cattoir & Wim Koevoets & Werner Vanborren, 2004. "European Tax Survey," Taxation Papers 3, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission, revised Nov 2004.
    11. Kay Blaufus & Sebastian Eichfelder & Jochen Hundsdoerfer, 2014. "Income Tax Compliance Costs of Working Individuals," Public Finance Review, , vol. 42(6), pages 800-829, November.
    12. Kay Blaufus & Frank Hechtner & Janine K. Jarzembski, 2019. "The Income Tax Compliance Costs of Private Households: Empirical Evidence from Germany," Public Finance Review, , vol. 47(5), pages 925-966, September.
    13. Schenkel, Andreas, 2015. "Bankenregulierung und Bürokratiekosten: Ein Problemaufriss," Arbeitspapiere 152, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    14. James, Simon & Alley, Clinton, 2002. "Tax compliance, self-assessment and tax administration," MPRA Paper 26906, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Eichfelder, Sebastian & Kegels, Chantal, 2014. "Compliance costs caused by agency action? Empirical evidence and implications for tax compliance," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 200-219.
    16. repec:npf:wpaper:08 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Allen Huang & Benjamin Liu, 2013. "The GST and mortgage costs: Australian evidence," Discussion Papers in Finance finance:201302, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
    18. Sofie De Schoenmaker & Philippe Van Cauwenberge & Heidi Vander Bauwhede, 2014. "Effects of local fiscal policy on firm profitability," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(16), pages 1289-1306, December.
    19. Jaspal Singh & Poonam Sharma, 2010. "Compliance Cost Burden of Individual Income-Tax Assessees in India: An Empirical Study," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 35(1), pages 7-24, February.
    20. Idawati Ibrahim Author_Email: idawati@uum.edu.my & Jeff Pope, 2011. "Compliance Costs Of Electronic Tax Filing For Personal Taxpayers In Malaysia," International Conference on Management (ICM 2011) Proceeding 2011-067-242, Conference Master Resources.
    21. Eliška Vejchodská & Lenka Slavíková & Vítězslav Malý, . "Evaluating the Regulatory Burden: Pollutant Release and Transfer Reporting Costs," Prague Economic Papers, University of Economics, Prague, vol. 0, pages 1-15.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipf:finteo:v:33:y:2009:i:2:p:219-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martina Fabris (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ijfffhr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.