IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v5y1958i1p121-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward More Clarity in Business Communications by Modern Logical Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Layman E. Allen

    (Yale University)

Abstract

A systematically organized method of writing can improve an organization's communications. Such a systematic method of writing can be expressed in the technical notation of modern symbolic logic or in a modified form of ordinary English prose that can be easily understood by readers who have not had any training in modern logic. This method can provide both a means of detecting ambiguities and a means of simplifying complicated statements without changing their meaning. Once an ambiguity is detected a writer can cut that ambiguity out, or he can allow it to remain. He is not forced to delete ambiguity in the systematically organized method of writing suggested in this article. This method of writing is likely to be used by organizations if, and only if, its merits are fully understood.

Suggested Citation

  • Layman E. Allen, 1958. "Toward More Clarity in Business Communications by Modern Logical Methods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 121-135, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:5:y:1958:i:1:p:121-135
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.5.1.121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.5.1.121
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.5.1.121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:5:y:1958:i:1:p:121-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.