IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v57y2011i9p1546-1563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal and Competitive Assortments with Endogenous Pricing Under Hierarchical Consumer Choice Models

Author

Listed:
  • A. Gürhan Kök

    (Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)

  • Yi Xu

    (Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742)

Abstract

This paper studies assortment planning and pricing for a product category with heterogeneous product types from two brands. We model consumer choice using the nested multinomial logit framework with two different hierarchical structures: a brand-primary model in which consumers choose a brand first, then a product type in the chosen brand, and a type-primary model in which consumers choose a product type first, then a brand within that product type. We consider a centralized regime that finds the optimal solution for the whole category and a decentralized regime that finds a competitive equilibrium between two brands. We find that optimal and competitive assortments and prices have quite distinctive properties across different models. Specifically, with the brand-primary model, both the optimal and the competitive assortments for each brand consist of the most popular product types from the brand. With the type-primary choice model, the optimal and the competitive assortments for each brand may not always consist of the most popular product types of the brand. Instead, the overall assortment in the category consists of a set of most popular product types. The price of a product under the centralized regime can be characterized by a sum of a markup that is constant across all products and brands, its procurement cost, and its marginal operational cost, implying a lower price for more popular products. The markup may be different for each brand and product type under the decentralized regime, implying a higher price for brands with a larger market share. These properties of the assortments and prices can be used as effective guidelines for managers to identify and price the best assortments and to rule out nonoptimal assortments. Our results suggest that to offer the right set of products and prices, category and/or brand managers should create an assortment planning process that is aligned with the hierarchical choice process consumers commonly follow to make purchasing decisions. This paper was accepted by Pradeep Chintagunta and Preyas Desai, special issue editors. This paper was accepted by Pradeep Chintagunta and Preyas Desai, special issue editors.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Gürhan Kök & Yi Xu, 2011. "Optimal and Competitive Assortments with Endogenous Pricing Under Hierarchical Consumer Choice Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(9), pages 1546-1563, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:57:y:2011:i:9:p:1546-1563
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1402
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gérard P. Cachon & Christian Terwiesch & Yi Xu, 2008. "On the Effects of Consumer Search and Firm Entry in a Multiproduct Competitive Market," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 461-473, 05-06.
    2. A. Gürhan Kök & Marshall L. Fisher & Ramnath Vaidyanathan, 2008. "Assortment Planning: Review of Literature and Industry Practice," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Narendra Agrawal & Stephen A. Smith (ed.), Retail Supply Chain Management, chapter 0, pages 99-153, Springer.
    3. Anderson, Simon P & de Palma, Andre, 1992. "Multiproduct Firms: A Nested Logit Approach," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 261-276, September.
    4. Ayd{i}n Alptekinou{g}lu & Charles J. Corbett, 2008. "Mass Customization vs. Mass Production: Variety and Price Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 204-217, August.
    5. Mümin Kurtuluc{s} & Alper Nakkas, 2011. "Retail Assortment Planning Under Category Captainship," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 124-142, March.
    6. Michaela Draganska & Dipak C. Jain, 2006. "Consumer Preferences and Product-Line Pricing Strategies: An Empirical Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 164-174, 03-04.
    7. Katz, Michael L, 1984. "Firm-Specific Differentiation and Competition among Multiproduct Firms," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57(1), pages 149-166, January.
    8. Vishal Gaur & Dorothée Honhon, 2006. "Assortment Planning and Inventory Decisions Under a Locational Choice Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(10), pages 1528-1543, October.
    9. Juin-Kuan Chong & Teck-Hua Ho & Christopher S. Tang, 2001. "A Modeling Framework for Category Assortment Planning," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 191-210, January.
    10. Dmitri Kuksov & J. Miguel Villas-Boas, 2010. "When More Alternatives Lead to Less Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 507-524, 05-06.
    11. David R. Bell & James M. Lattin, 1998. "Shopping Behavior and Consumer Preference for Store Price Format: Why “Large Basket” Shoppers Prefer EDLP," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 66-88.
    12. Fernando Bernstein & A. Gürhan Kök & Lei Xie, 2011. "The Role of Component Commonality in Product Assortment Decisions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 261-270, August.
    13. J. Miguel Villas-Boas, 1998. "Product Line Design for a Distribution Channel," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 156-169.
    14. Peter M. Guadagni & John D. C. Little, 1983. "A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 203-238.
    15. Rajiv Grover & William R. Dillon, 1985. "A Probabilistic Model For Testing Hypothesized Hierarchical Market Structures," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 312-335.
    16. Dmitri Kuksov, 2004. "Buyer Search Costs and Endogenous Product Design," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 490-499, May.
    17. J. Miguel Villas-Boas, 2009. "Product Variety and Endogenous Pricing with Evaluation Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(8), pages 1338-1346, August.
    18. Garrett van Ryzin & Siddharth Mahajan, 1999. "On the Relationship Between Inventory Costs and Variety Benefits in Retail Assortments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(11), pages 1496-1509, November.
    19. Dorothée Honhon & Vishal Gaur & Sridhar Seshadri, 2010. "Assortment Planning and Inventory Decisions Under Stockout-Based Substitution," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 1364-1379, October.
    20. A. Gürhan Kök & Marshall L. Fisher, 2007. "Demand Estimation and Assortment Optimization Under Substitution: Methodology and Application," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 1001-1021, December.
    21. Wallace J. Hopp & Xiaowei Xu, 2005. "Product Line Selection and Pricing with Modularity in Design," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 172-187, August.
    22. Preyas S. Desai, 2001. "Quality Segmentation in Spatial Markets: When Does Cannibalization Affect Product Line Design?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 265-283, August.
    23. Glen L. Urban & Philip L. Johnson & John R. Hauser, 1984. "Testing Competitive Market Structures," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 83-112.
    24. Anthony J. Dukes & Tansev Geylani & Kannan Srinivasan, 2009. "Strategic Assortment Reduction by a Dominant Retailer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 309-319, 03-04.
    25. Lingxiu Dong & Chakravarthi Narasimhan & Kaijie Zhu, 2009. "Product Line Pricing in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(10), pages 1704-1717, October.
    26. P. K. Kannan & Gordon P. Wright, 1991. "Modeling and Testing Structured Markets: A Nested Logit Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 58-82.
    27. Goker Aydin & Evan L. Porteus, 2008. "Joint Inventory and Pricing Decisions for an Assortment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 1247-1255, October.
    28. K. Sridhar Moorthy, 1984. "Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line Design," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 288-307.
    29. Udo Schmidt-Mohr & J. Villas-Boas, 2008. "Competitive product lines with quality constraints," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, March.
    30. Greg M. Allenby, 1989. "A Unified Approach to Identifying, Estimating and Testing Demand Structures with Aggregate Scanner Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 265-280.
    31. Stephen A. Smith & Narendra Agrawal, 2000. "Management of Multi-Item Retail Inventory Systems with Demand Substitution," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 50-64, February.
    32. Gérard P. Cachon & Christian Terwiesch & Yi Xu, 2005. "Retail Assortment Planning in the Presence of Consumer Search," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 330-346, August.
    33. Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 1993. "Investigating Purchase Incidence, Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Decisions of Households," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 184-208.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hai Jiang & Xin Qi & He Sun, 2014. "Choice-Based Recommender Systems: A Unified Approach to Achieving Relevancy and Diversity," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 973-993, October.
    2. Vidya Mani & Douglas J. Thomas & Saurabh Bansal, 2022. "Estimating Substitution and Basket Effects in Retail Stores: Implications for Assortment Planning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5002-5024, July.
    3. Dorothée Honhon & Vishal Gaur & Sridhar Seshadri, 2010. "Assortment Planning and Inventory Decisions Under Stockout-Based Substitution," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 1364-1379, October.
    4. Lingxiu Dong & Panos Kouvelis & Zhongjun Tian, 2009. "Dynamic Pricing and Inventory Control of Substitute Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 317-339, December.
    5. Shin, Hojung & Park, Soohoon & Lee, Euncheol & Benton, W.C., 2015. "A classification of the literature on the planning of substitutable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 686-699.
    6. Qiu, Jiaqing & Li, Xiangyong & Duan, Yongrui & Chen, Mengxi & Tian, Peng, 2020. "Dynamic assortment in the presence of brand heterogeneity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    7. Umpfenbach, Edward Lawrence & Dalkiran, Evrim & Chinnam, Ratna Babu & Murat, Alper Ekrem, 2018. "Promoting sustainability of automotive products through strategic assortment planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 272-285.
    8. Tang, Christopher S., 2010. "A review of marketing-operations interface models: From co-existence to coordination and collaboration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 22-40, May.
    9. Chan, Rebecca & Li, Zhaolin & Matsypura, Dmytro, 2020. "Assortment optimisation problem: A distribution-free approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Wallace J. Hopp & Xiaowei Xu, 2008. "A Static Approximation for Dynamic Demand Substitution with Applications in a Competitive Market," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 630-645, June.
    11. Vineet Goyal & Retsef Levi & Danny Segev, 2016. "Near-Optimal Algorithms for the Assortment Planning Problem Under Dynamic Substitution and Stochastic Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 219-235, February.
    12. Yücel, Eda & Karaesmen, Fikri & Salman, F. Sibel & Türkay, Metin, 2009. "Optimizing product assortment under customer-driven demand substitution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 759-768, December.
    13. Maria Mayorga & Hyun-Soo Ahn & Goker Aydin, 2013. "Assortment and inventory decisions with multiple quality levels," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 301-331, December.
    14. Transchel, Sandra, 2017. "Inventory management under price-based and stockout-based substitution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 996-1008.
    15. Maxim Sinitsyn, 2016. "Managing Price Promotions Within a Product Line," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 304-318, March.
    16. A. Gürhan Kök & Marshall L. Fisher, 2007. "Demand Estimation and Assortment Optimization Under Substitution: Methodology and Application," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 1001-1021, December.
    17. Menezes, Mozart B.C. & Pinto, Roberto, 2022. "Product proliferation, cannibalisation, and substitution: A first look into entailed risk and complexity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    18. Bing Jing, 2016. "Lowering Customer Evaluation Costs, Product Differentiation, and Price Competition," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 113-127, January.
    19. Marshall Fisher & Ramnath Vaidyanathan, 2014. "A Demand Estimation Procedure for Retail Assortment Optimization with Results from Implementations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(10), pages 2401-2415, October.
    20. Gérard P. Cachon & A. Gürhan Kök, 2007. "Category Management and Coordination in Retail Assortment Planning in the Presence of Basket Shopping Consumers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 934-951, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:57:y:2011:i:9:p:1546-1563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.