IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v43y1997i9p1198-1213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inspection for Circuit Board Assembly

Author

Listed:
  • Phillipe B. Chevalier

    (Institut d'Administration et de Gestion, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium)

  • Lawrence M. Wein

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)

Abstract

Several stages of tests are typically performed in circuit board assembly, and each test consists of one or more noisy measurements. We consider the problem of jointly optimizing the allocation of inspection and the testing policy in a system with a predefined inspection configuration; that is, at which stages should a board be inspected, and at these stages, whether to accept or reject a board based on noisy test measurements. The objective is to minimize the expected costs for testing, repair, and defective items shipped to customers. We analyze the problem and document an application of the model to an industrial facility. Since we were unable to gather all the necessary data, the model was applied in a limited and piecemeal fashion. Nevertheless, the proposed policy significantly improves upon the facility's historical policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillipe B. Chevalier & Lawrence M. Wein, 1997. "Inspection for Circuit Board Assembly," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(9), pages 1198-1213, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:43:y:1997:i:9:p:1198-1213
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.43.9.1198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.9.1198
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.43.9.1198?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salih Tekin & Sigrún Andradóttir, 2020. "Inspection location in capacity-constrained lines," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(3), pages 905-937, September.
    2. Paul F. Zantek & Gordon P. Wright & Robert D. Plante, 2002. "Process and Product Improvement in Manufacturing Systems with Correlated Stages," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(5), pages 591-606, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:43:y:1997:i:9:p:1198-1213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.