IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v41y1995i4p733-737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Note: On the Value of Function Evaluation Location Information in Monte Carlo Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas J. DiCiccio

    (Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Peter W. Glynn

    (Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

Abstract

The point estimator used in naive Monte Carlo sampling weights all the computed function evaluations equally, and it does not take into account the precise locations at which the function evaluations are made. In this note, we consider one-dimensional integration problems in which the integrand is twice continuously differentiable. It is shown that if the weights are suitably modified to reflect the location information present in the sample, then the convergence rate of the Monte Carlo estimator can be dramatically improved from order n -1/2 to order n -2 , where n is the number of function evaluations computed.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas J. DiCiccio & Peter W. Glynn, 1995. "Note: On the Value of Function Evaluation Location Information in Monte Carlo Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 733-737, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:41:y:1995:i:4:p:733-737
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.41.4.733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.4.733
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.41.4.733?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hatem Ben-Ameur & Pierre L'Ecuyer & Christiane Lemieux, 2004. "Combination of General Antithetic Transformations and Control Variables," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 946-960, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:41:y:1995:i:4:p:733-737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.