IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v34y1988i12p1450-1459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamically Updating Relevance Judgements in Probabilistic Information Systems Via Users' Feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Peter J. Lenk

    (Graduate School of Business Administration, New York University, 100 Trinity Place, New York, New York 10006)

  • Barry D. Floyd

    (Graduate School of Business Administration, New York University, 100 Trinity Place, New York, New York 10006)

Abstract

A decision maker's performance relies on the availability of relevant information. In many environments, the relation between the decision maker's informational needs and the information base is complex and uncertain. A fundamental concept of information systems, such as decision support and document retrieval, is the probability that the retrieved information is useful to the decision maker's query. This paper presents a sequential, Bayesian, probabilistic indexing model that explicitly combines expert opinion with data about the system's performance. The expert opinion is encoded into probability statements. These statements are modified by the users' feedback about the relevance of the retrieved information to their queries. The predictive probability that a datum in the information base is applicable to the current query is a logistic function of the expert opinion and the feedback. This feedback enters the computation through a measure of association between the current query-datum pair with previous, relevant query-datum pairs. When this measure is based on the proportional matching of multiple attributes, the predictive probabilities have a recursive formula that makes the model computationally feasible for large information bases.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter J. Lenk & Barry D. Floyd, 1988. "Dynamically Updating Relevance Judgements in Probabilistic Information Systems Via Users' Feedback," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(12), pages 1450-1459, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:34:y:1988:i:12:p:1450-1459
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.34.12.1450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.34.12.1450
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.34.12.1450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehrez, A. & Yuan, Y. & Gafni, A., 1995. "The search for information -- A patient perspective on multiple opinions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 244-262, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:34:y:1988:i:12:p:1450-1459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.