IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v29y1983i3p335-351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sequential Analysis of the Stay/Leave Decision: U.S. Air Force Officers

Author

Listed:
  • Glenn A. Gotz

    (The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica)

  • John J. McCall

    (The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica)

Abstract

This paper develops a model to study the stay/leave decisions of Air Force officers. The model includes the most important institutional factors affecting an officer's career: promotion probabilities and timing, regular force integration probabilities, and mandatory separation and retirement probabilities. The model considers the officer's income for each potential combination of future grade and year of service and his civilian income opportunities. The model studies the incentives to retire for the current nondisability retirement system and the recent proposal by the President's Commission on Military Compensation. Numerical results are presented using actual data from Fiscal Year 1970 for nonrated officers who entered the Air Force through ROTC. On average, the officers' stay/leave behavior conforms with the model's predictions. Dynamic programming is the methodology used to construct the stay/leave model. Two versions of the dynamic programming model are considered. First, a sequential decision model for a risk-neutral agent is developed. The second version of the dynamic programming model generalizes the risk-neutral case to encompass risk-aversion. A functional equation is developed in which there is temporal resolution of uncertainty with respect to both military and civilian incomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Glenn A. Gotz & John J. McCall, 1983. "Sequential Analysis of the Stay/Leave Decision: U.S. Air Force Officers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 335-351, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:29:y:1983:i:3:p:335-351
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.29.3.335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.335
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bradley M. Gray & James E. Grefer, 2012. "Career Earnings And Retention Of U.S. Military Physicians," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 51-76, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:29:y:1983:i:3:p:335-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.