IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v26y1980i7p707-718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Decision Analysis Model for a Serious Medical Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Peña Sanchez de Rivera

    (Escuela de Organizacion Industrial, and E.T.S. Ingenieros Industriales, Madrid)

Abstract

This paper presents a decision model for a serious medical problem: the diagnosis and treatment of undifferentiated liver disease with jaundice. The model formalizes the use of information before a treatment is chosen, taking account of prior information collected by the doctor from laboratory and clinical exploration. Then the model chooses the best treatment according to the patient's preference structure. Since the best treatment in each case depends on the patient's preference for consequences, this aspect is central to the application of such models. Thus a main objective is to find a suitable criterion to measure the consequences in order that each patient's attitude can be taken into account. Our model was computerized and tested with fifty patients: the program duplicated in forty-four cases the decisions of expert doctors. The model overcomes some of the difficulties observed in the manipulation of probabilities by clinicians. The results suggest that a Decision Analysis model may be a useful way to clarify the decision process of expert clinicians and to help in the education of new doctors. Finally, this kind of program can play a role in automating medical decision-making in such a way that the knowledge of the best experts can be made widely available.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Peña Sanchez de Rivera, 1980. "A Decision Analysis Model for a Serious Medical Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 707-718, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:26:y:1980:i:7:p:707-718
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.26.7.707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.7.707
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.26.7.707?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:26:y:1980:i:7:p:707-718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.