IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v26y1980i4p387-400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Committee Decision Making: A Game Theoretical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Prakash P. Shenoy

    (University of Kansas)

Abstract

In this paper, we study the committee decision making process using game theory. By a committee, we mean any group of people who have to pick one option from a given set of alternatives. A well defined voting rule is specified by which the committee arrives at a decision. Each member has a preference relation on the set of all alternatives. A new solution concept called the one-core is introduced and studied. Intuitively, the one-core consists of all maximal (for the proposer) proposals which are undominated assuming that the player who makes the proposal does not cooperate in any effort to dominate the proposal. For games with non-emtpy cores, the one-core proposals are shown to be better than the core. For games with empty cores, the one-core proposals tend to be pessimistic, i.e., they indicate the security level of the players. This is because the stability requirements of the one-core are too strong for such games. A bargaining set modeled along the lines of the Aumann-Maschler bargaining set for characteristic function games is defined for committee games. Because of its relaxed stability requirements, the bargaining set indicates more reasonable proposals than the one-core. The existence of both the one-core and the bargaining set are studied and these concepts are compared with two other well known solution concepts---the core and the Condorcet solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Prakash P. Shenoy, 1980. "On Committee Decision Making: A Game Theoretical Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 387-400, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:26:y:1980:i:4:p:387-400
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.26.4.387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.4.387
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.26.4.387?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iakubov, Igor T. & Pogosov, Valentin V., 1995. "Towards a theory of self-compressed metallic clusters. Model of stabilized jellium," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 287-294.
    2. Momo Kenfack, Joseph Armel & Pongou, Roland & Tchantcho, Bertrand, 2014. "The stability of decision making in committees: The one-core," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 390-395.
    3. Breitmoser, Yves & Tan, Jonathan H.W., 2020. "Why should majority voting be unfair?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 281-295.
    4. Joseph Armel Momo Kenfack, 2022. "Committees under qualified majority rules: the one-core stability index," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 59(2), pages 401-422, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    games/group decisions; voting/committees;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:26:y:1980:i:4:p:387-400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.