IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v24y1978i9p887-898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Process and Product of System Design

Author

Listed:
  • Richard J. Boland, Jr.

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

Abstract

Given that user involvement is important in system design, this study addresses the as yet unexplored question of how a user should be involved in the system design process. Two radically different processes of interaction between a systems designer and a manager were compared in an information system design exercise. In one interaction process, the designer conducted a traditional interview of the manager. He asked questions, analyzed data and made suggestions. In the alternative interaction process, there was an initial sharing of information and mutual suggestions, followed by a critique of each other's suggestions. The study found that for this ill-structured problem: 1. The alternative interaction process produced higher quality designs with important implementation advantages. 2. The two interaction processes produced designs which used different types of organization control strategies. 3. These results may be due to a problem finding contingency--different processes of interaction may help to define different problems, and thereby produce different, but equally rational, solutions. 4. For the management of organization design, the process of interacting with users has important implications for the quality of the resulting design, the type of organization control strategy employed, and the subsequent implementation of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard J. Boland, Jr., 1978. "The Process and Product of System Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(9), pages 887-898, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:24:y:1978:i:9:p:887-898
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.24.9.887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.24.9.887
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.24.9.887?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Imran Currim & Vijay Gurbaxani & James LaBelle & Jooseop Lim, 2006. "Perceptual structure of the desired functionality of internet-based health information systems," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 151-170, May.
    2. Rajiv D. Banker & Robert J. Kauffman, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: The Evolution of Research on Information Systems: A Fiftieth-Year Survey of the Literature in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 281-298, March.
    3. A. Georges L. Romme, 2003. "Making a Difference: Organization as Design," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(5), pages 558-573, October.
    4. George M. Marakas & Joyce J. Elam, 1998. "Semantic Structuring in Analyst Acquisition and Representation of Facts in Requirements Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 37-63, March.
    5. Patricia J. Guinan & Jay G. Cooprider & Samer Faraj, 1998. "Enabling Software Development Team Performance During Requirements Definition: A Behavioral Versus Technical Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 101-125, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:24:y:1978:i:9:p:887-898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.