IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v24y1978i15p1642-1649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Priority Assignment of OSHA Safety Inspectors

Author

Listed:
  • Everett E. Adam, Jr.

    (University of Missouri--Columbia)

Abstract

A priority assignment model for OSHA safety inspectors was developed and tested using 34,500 actual employee injuries from a total of 105,000 injuries in Missouri during 1973. The model combines expert opinions concerning selection of injury criteria and data from, reports of employee injuries. First the model computes a relative accident performance score for each employer. Employers are then grouped by general industrial classification and ranked according to their relative accident performance score. This "worst-first" ranking provides the rationale for assigning OSHA safety inspectors to employer locations. The model and research have been reviewed by Region VII OSHA personnel and implementation is currently under consideration within the Department of Labor. This model could replace current random assignment of inspectors in Missouri. Region VII, and the nation.

Suggested Citation

  • Everett E. Adam, Jr., 1978. "Priority Assignment of OSHA Safety Inspectors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(15), pages 1642-1649, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:24:y:1978:i:15:p:1642-1649
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.24.15.1642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.24.15.1642
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.24.15.1642?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    government; planning;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:24:y:1978:i:15:p:1642-1649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.