IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v11y1964i1p105-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Effects of Technological Innovations

Author

Listed:
  • Bela Gold

    (University of Pittsburgh)

Abstract

This paper reports on research which is both historical and analytical. The historical aspect of this study comprehends the years 1899-1939 and reports on the behavior of costs, wages, output and related physical measures in 5 basic industries plus "all manufacturing." Generally speaking the ratios of labor and capital inputs to total output during this period do not show the kinds of "substitution effects" that might have been expected during the period covered. The data indicate that technological innovation and investment were, in fact, neutral in terms of labor-capital ratios which prevailed during this period. These are, of course, only long-run phenomena. Transient patterns generally produce changes in the physical ratios which, however, are subsequently offset in value terms. Furthermore only industry aggregates are examined. Evidently, then, any individual firm may find itself out of line with these ratios at any moment of time depending on its status as an innovator, follower, etc. Flow models are developed to interpret and explain these results. In these models the physical substitutions are depicted as being subsequently counterbalanced by market price reactions flowing from these (or other) investment decisions. These models are, of course, not restricted to the period under consideration and can therefore be used to guide analyses and investigations for subsequent periods. Thus, for instance, consider the investment decisions of management in the period under review--i.e., 1899-1939. These decisions were based on piecemeal analyses and rule-of-thumb guides. Is it the case that more sophisticated techniques--such as those which accompany operations research developments--will produce a difference in the observed ratios of labor to capital inputs in these (or other) industries? The models and the results presented in this study raise this question in a way that may prove helpful in a subsequent analysis designed to test the effects of operations research--or other factors--on the investment decisions now being undertaken. Alternatively, these models and results may provide helpful guidance in particular applications. Thus, for instance, if persistence is assumed for the phenomena we note, then issues of short- vs. long-run strategy become of major importance for possible consideration and incorporation in any operations research models used to guide investment decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bela Gold, 1964. "Economic Effects of Technological Innovations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 105-134, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:11:y:1964:i:1:p:105-134
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.11.1.105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.11.1.105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.11.1.105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rajiv D. Banker & Robert J. Kauffman, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: The Evolution of Research on Information Systems: A Fiftieth-Year Survey of the Literature in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 281-298, March.
    2. Scott A. Shane & Karl T. Ulrich, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Technological Innovation, Product Development, and Entrepreneurship in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 133-144, February.
    3. Barbiroli, Giancarlo, 1995. "Measuring technological dynamics and structural change, their interrelationships and their effects," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 377-396, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:11:y:1964:i:1:p:105-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.