Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Pervasive Gaming: Testing Future Context Aware Applications

Contents:

Author Info

  • Paul PISJAK

    (Rundfunk- und Telekom-Regulierungs GmbH, Vienna)

  • Stefan FELDER

    (Rundfunk- und Telekom-Regulierungs GmbH, Vienna)

  • Ernst-Olav RUHLE

    (SBR Juconomy Consulting AG, Düsseldorf/Vienna)

  • Martin LUNDBORG

    (SBR Juconomy Consulting AG, Düsseldorf/Vienna)

  • Matthias EHRLER

    (SBR Juconomy Consulting AG, Düsseldorf/Vienna)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Over the last few years, many discussions have centred around the issue of interconnection rates and their economic impact on the market. Interconnection charging in Europe is still based mainly on the calling party pays (CPP) principle combined with element based charging (EBC). Due to the convergence of the classical PSTN/ISDN and the IP world to next generation networks (NGN), the different charging principles and systems are being reviewed to determine the optimal solution for the future. In its working program for the year 2008, the Austrian Regulatory Authority (RTR) launched an industry working group on charging principles and systems for wholesale services. This paper highlights some of the central issues of the discussions that have taken place and contains the authors’ views and conclusions .1 Further, the paper identifies possible charging systems, as well as economic assessment criteria for these systems and how the different charging systems may be evaluated with respect to those criteria. Regarding the usefulness of industry working groups, the work has shown that these lead to a higher degree of transparency between regulator and market players as well as a better understanding between the market players themselves. The main drawback is that working groups are time consuming and that it is almost impossible to agree on meaningful outcomes. Regarding the assessment of the charging models it was possible to derive a set of 10 criteria according to which charging systems can be evaluated. There was a rather broad consensus on the delineation of charging models as well as the economic criteria. When it comes to the results of the evaluation, the discussions brought forward very controversial views amongst the participants. No common views could be achieved on which the charging model fulfills the defined criteria in the best manner.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://repec.idate.fr/RePEc/idt/journl/CS7306/CS73_PISJAK_et_al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by IDATE, Com&Strat dept. in its journal Communications & Strategies.

    Volume (Year): 1 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 73 (1st quarter)
    Pages: 129-152

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:idt:journl:cs7306

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: BP 4167, 34092 Montpellier cedex 5
    Phone: 33 (0)467 144 444
    Fax: 33 (0)467 144 400
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.idate.org/en/Home/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Interconnection; NGN; charging principles; CPP; Bill&Keep.;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idt:journl:cs7306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (BLAVIER Thomas).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.