Malformed frogs: Bayesian and random-effect model analyses
AbstractHistorical data (1958â€“1963) on frog malformations in Minnesota, USA, are compared to malformation data collected from 1996 to 1999, at many of the same collection sites, to investigate malformation risk changes between the study periods. We initially consider Mantel-Haenszel and simple logistic regression analyses. Potential variation in risk across data collection sites lead to random-effect logistic regression and hierarchical Bayesian models. We find clear evidence of increased malformation risk in the 1990s data collection period. The random-effect logistic regression and Bayesian logistic regression analyses produce similar point estimates of relative risk, and uncertainty, but Bayesian models allow analysts to view the impact of additional information on the inferences. Bayesian analyses programs in WinBUGS and SAS are provided.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Inderscience Enterprises Ltd in its journal Int. J. of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies.
Volume (Year): 2 (2010)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=282
historical data; logistic regression; Mantel-Haenszel; MCMC; markov chain monte carlo; malformation risk; WinBUGS; malformed frogs; malformations; random-effect models; Bayesian.;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Graham Langley).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.