IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsusd/v7y2004i1p1-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust as a central paradigm for advisory science: the case of the Belgian nuclear phase-out

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Laes
  • Gaston Meskens
  • William D'haeseleer
  • Raoul Weiler

Abstract

The Belgian parliament has decided to phase out the existing nuclear power plants as part of the government's strategy to achieve sustainable development. According to the authors, this nuclear phaseout can be regarded as belonging to a class of unstructured problems in science for policy-making, i.e. problems where there exists a debate on the scientific facts as well as on the values at stake. When society is confronted with unstructured problems, insights from recent risk research literature point at the overriding importance of trust in arrangements at the cutting edge of science and policy. We investigated the Belgian science–policy interface from the point of view of trust building, also guided by insights from interviews with members of the Belgian Federal Council for Sustainable Development. The results were analysed on three levels of discourse: the cognitive, the reflective and the design or planning discourse. On each level, flaws in the trust-building fabric could be demonstrated.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Laes & Gaston Meskens & William D'haeseleer & Raoul Weiler, 2004. "Trust as a central paradigm for advisory science: the case of the Belgian nuclear phase-out," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsusd:v:7:y:2004:i:1:p:1-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=4984
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsusd:v:7:y:2004:i:1:p:1-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=25 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.