Brokerage firms' revenue and profitability of their recommendations: before and after 1999-2002
AbstractWe examine how the research departments of brokerage firms may issue biased recommendations in order to boost the revenue of the investment banking departments of the brokerage firms during 1993-2006. We find that during 1993-2006, sanctioned brokerage firms' upgrades not only underperformed the upgrades of non-sanctioned brokerage firms, but they also earned negative abnormal returns. The degree of underperformance for sanctioned brokerage firms' upgrades was at the highest during 1999-2002. More surprisingly, the underperformance of upgrades continues in 2003-2006. We also find weak evidence of underperformance of upgrades in the period of 1993-1998.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Inderscience Enterprises Ltd in its journal Int. J. of Revenue Management.
Volume (Year): 3 (2009)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=99
analyst recommendations; brokerage firms; brokerage revenue; conflict of interest; global settlement; revenue management; bias; investment banking; under-performance; upgrades.;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Graham Langley).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.