IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpubp/v5y2010i2-3p272-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Job design and the psychological status of Taiwanese pharmacists on job outcomes: an application of the job characteristics model

Author

Listed:
  • Blossom Yen-Ju Lin
  • Ying-Chen Yeh
  • Wen-Hung Lin

Abstract

For decades, job design and redesign have been viewed by the field of organisational behaviour as factors that influence employees' job psychological statuses and job outcomes. As such, this study thoroughly examines the job characteristics model (JCM) – including the constructs of core job characteristics, psychological statuses, individual growth needs and work outcomes – with regard to pharmacists, based on the theoretical framework of JCM. Two hundred ninety-eight pharmacists responded to mailed surveys. Applying structural equation modelling (SEM), the results partially verified JCM especially with respect to the pathway of job content – characterised as task variety, integrity and significance – to the experienced meaningfulness of work, as well as to their work outcomes, including higher internal work motivation, work performance quality, work satisfaction and reduced intentions/desires to quit. We anticipate that pharmacy managers could appropriately manipulate the job tasks of pharmacists, as well as to assist and identify possible adverse side effects derived from pharmacists' work climates, as a means to generate more favourable and effective work outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Blossom Yen-Ju Lin & Ying-Chen Yeh & Wen-Hung Lin, 2010. "Job design and the psychological status of Taiwanese pharmacists on job outcomes: an application of the job characteristics model," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2/3), pages 272-289.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:5:y:2010:i:2/3:p:272-289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=30608
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:5:y:2010:i:2/3:p:272-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=97 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.