From clouds to hailstorms: a policy and administrative science perspective on safeguarding public values in networked infrastructures
AbstractThis paper analyses how public values are achieved in Dutch infrastructures and distinguishes four crucial stages in decision making processes: the advocacy process, the political process, the bureaucratic process and the provision process. An important conclusion of this paper is that the character of public values undergoes significant changes in each of these stages of the decision-making process, generally from more abstract notions to more concrete. With the level of abstraction, the content of the public value also tends to shift from stage to stage. We conclude that a balanced repertoire of safeguarding mechanisms should address the various stages.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Inderscience Enterprises Ltd in its journal Int. J. of Public Policy.
Volume (Year): 4 (2009)
Issue (Month): 5 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=97
public values; infrastructures; decision making; policy science; administrative science; water sector; public transport; power sector; energy sector; The Netherlands.;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Veeneman, Wijnand & Koppenjan, Joop, 2010. "Securing public values in public transport projects: Four Dutch cases on innovation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 224-230.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Graham Langley).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.