IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijplur/v2y2011i3p255-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic sociology – old and new

Author

Listed:
  • Adel Daoud
  • Bengt Larsson

Abstract

In this article, we discuss 'classical' sociology and 'new' economic sociology to show the interest of sociologists in economic issues and to examine the relationship between economics and sociology from a sociological perspective. We maintain that, besides empirical studies, sociologists have contributed to the analysis of economic systems, organisations, and action through the development of theoretical approaches to answer two basic questions: Why are the neoclassical assumptions about action problematic? And how are rational economic actions and systems produced? Sociologists have worked on three frontiers to answer these questions. First, by developing a more nuanced action theory. Second, by elaborating the concept of embeddedness to capture how economic action is influenced by cognitive, cultural, structural, and political contexts. Third, by understanding the historical differentiation and rationalisation of institutions and action contexts that produces instrumental rationality.

Suggested Citation

  • Adel Daoud & Bengt Larsson, 2011. "Economic sociology – old and new," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 255-269.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:2:y:2011:i:3:p:255-269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44270
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daoud, Adel & Kohl, Sebastian, 2016. "How much do sociologists write about economic topics? Using big data to test some conventional views in economic sociology, 1890 to 2014," MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:2:y:2011:i:3:p:255-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=319 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.