IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmnec/v2y2012i3p217-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competition between fixed and mobile broadband access based on mobility and data volumes

Author

Listed:
  • Julienne Liang

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to show that the assumption that fixed and mobile broadband markets are independent, on which current economic literature and broadband policies are based, needs to be revised and that explicit modelling of fixed and mobile interdependence is required. Empirical observations from markets and technology, which demonstrate the existence of a degree of fixed-mobile substitutability, lead us to propose a new modelling framework to analyse the interdependence of fixed and mobile broadband markets and address its impact on issues such as competition, prices and regulatory policies. Fixed and mobile broadband offers have asymmetrical characteristics to match consumers' demand functions, expressed in terms of willingness to pay for certain levels of mobility and data volumes. In this framework, a duopoly and then an oligopoly model are proposed to analyse the competition between fixed and mobile broadband access. Effects of fixed-mobile interdependence are modelled such as, for instance, how a fixed monopoly price may be naturally regulated by a competitive mobile market. The paper also examines how the new framework enables us to model the impact of future technological and commercial developments such as the deployment of LTE for mobile networks and FTTH for fixed networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Julienne Liang, 2012. "Competition between fixed and mobile broadband access based on mobility and data volumes," International Journal of Management and Network Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 217-235.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmnec:v:2:y:2012:i:3:p:217-235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=48512
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmnec:v:2:y:2012:i:3:p:217-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=259 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.