Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

On the role of volatility for modelling risk exposure


Author Info

  • Jose Olmo


We show in this paper that volatility measures can be misleading indicators of risk if returns do not follow a Gaussian distribution. A more reliable measure of risk is the probability distribution of the return on an asset. Estimators for these measures are usually challenging and need of nonparametric and semi-parametric techniques. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, it proposes the use of semi-parametric estimators of the distribution function of the return on an asset based on extreme value theory for computing Value-at-Risk; and second, it discusses the validity of different volatility models in this semi-parametric framework. The conclusion is that different volatility models can yield different valid risk measures if coupled with the appropriate distribution function. Hence the puzzle in the choice of volatility measures. This is shown in an empirical exercise for data of financial indexes from USA, UK, Germany, Japan and Spain.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Inderscience Enterprises Ltd in its journal Int. J. of Monetary Economics and Finance.

Volume (Year): 1 (2008)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 219-234

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmefi:v:1:y:2008:i:2:p:219-234

Contact details of provider:
Web page:

Related research

Keywords: backtesting; conditional heteroscedasticity; GARCH; risk measures; value-at-risk; VaR; volatility models; risk exposure; semiparametric estimators; probability distribution; extreme value theory; USA; United States; United Kingdom; UK; Germany; Japan; Spain.;


No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Philippe Lambert & S├ębastien Laurent & David Veredas, 2012. "Testing conditional asymmetry. A residual based approach," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/136195, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.


This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmefi:v:1:y:2008:i:2:p:219-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Graham Langley).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.