IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeded/v5y2014i1p113-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The scientific research wealth of African nations: do colonial origins matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Mawussé Komlagan Nézan Okey

Abstract

Africa performs relatively poor, in terms of scientific production compared to other regions of the world. Moreover, pronounced disparities persist in the number of scientific and technical journal articles published across countries of the continent. The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the role of colonial legacies in the scientific production in Africa. African countries have developed different scientific research and educational policies based on those of their former colonial powers. This has influenced differently the cost of scientific production as well as the ability of a given country's population to enrol in higher education, and allocate talented people into science and innovative activities rather than rent-seeking activities. Econometric tests are conducted on a panel of 47 African countries, over the period 1994 to 2009. Our results suggest that only the British colonial legacy affects positively the postcolonial scientific production. On average, former British colonies achieve higher number of scientific articles publications than former French or other colonies in Africa, because of their superior enrolment levels in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Mawussé Komlagan Nézan Okey, 2014. "The scientific research wealth of African nations: do colonial origins matter?," International Journal of Education Economics and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 113-125.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeded:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:113-125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=59876
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeded:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:113-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=346 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.