IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecbr/v3y2011i4p443-458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AHP-based group decision making using keypads

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Begicevic
  • Blazenka Divjak
  • Tihomir Hunjak

Abstract

In this paper, we deal with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-based group decision making using keypads. It is a way of aggregating group judgements that allows a group to enhance the validity of the outcome by including the importance of people's knowledge, expertise and experience, to accept the disparate power of its members when eliciting their judgements, and to make group decision making more efficient, by reducing the redundancy in judgements and spending less time and money on reaching an agreement. In addition, we present the case study 'Ranking the means of state support for international projects'. The purpose of this paper is to provide a thorough insight into the use of the AHP-based group decision making using keypads, i.e. a multiple criteria decision-making methodology which provides an effective framework for guiding managers in solving problems based on the group decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Begicevic & Blazenka Divjak & Tihomir Hunjak, 2011. "AHP-based group decision making using keypads," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 443-458.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:3:y:2011:i:4:p:443-458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=40953
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecbr:v:3:y:2011:i:4:p:443-458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=310 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.