IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijecac/v2y2011i3p242-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital standard setting: the inevitable paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • Miklos A. Vasarhelyi
  • J.P. Krahel

Abstract

Many steps in the creation and dissemination of new accounting standards lag behind the rest of the modern world. Issues are often addressed too late to rectify major problems, in language at once too vague to deal effectively with the nuances of real world business decisions, and too lengthy to be of use to managers who need to easily and quickly absorb a new manner of thinking. Standards must become clearer, more concise and more timely. We advocate an expansion of the FASB's promulgation framework. Specifically, we advocate an alternate, pseudocoded presentation. By translating written standards into a form that can easily be adapted by software developers into proprietary languages, the FASB will reduce ambiguity, increase uniformity of application, and reduce lag between the introduction of a standard and its universal implementation. We present and discuss two examples of the application of pseudocode to pre- and post-codification accounting standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Miklos A. Vasarhelyi & J.P. Krahel, 2011. "Digital standard setting: the inevitable paradigm," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 242-254.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:2:y:2011:i:3:p:242-254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=41895
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiu, Victoria & Liu, Qi & Vasarhelyi, Miklos A., 2014. "The development and intellectual structure of continuous auditing research," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 37-57.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:2:y:2011:i:3:p:242-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=357 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.