IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v14y2013i4p404-417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tata Communications Ltd. - benchmarking training and development practices with leading organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Manosi Chaudhuri
  • Geetika Dham

Abstract

This research aims at understanding the processes followed by the learning and development (L%D) team of Tata Communications Ltd. (TCL) and benchmarking their processes with those used at six other leading organisations. There are two key focus areas of the case: measuring training programme effectiveness and automation of processes. This study examines all the challenges that the L%D team at TCL is facing and offers practical suggestions and recommendations to improve the effectiveness of the processes being used. Primary data was collected for the purpose of benchmarking the processes. It was found that automation of processes, bilingual delivery of trainings, use of a robust training programme evaluation mechanism, etc., would ensure an increase in the popularity of trainings and result in more employees attending training programmes. This, in turn, would cater to the growth of the organisation by reducing errors, opening doors to emerging business opportunities and improving resource utilisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Manosi Chaudhuri & Geetika Dham, 2013. "Tata Communications Ltd. - benchmarking training and development practices with leading organisations," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 404-417.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:14:y:2013:i:4:p:404-417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=56869
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:14:y:2013:i:4:p:404-417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.