IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbpma/v12y2011i4p377-395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imitation or innovation to enhance the performance: an empirical investigation of 258 Chinese firms

Author

Listed:
  • Dawei Liu

Abstract

This paper is focused on the factors which determined the adoption of innovation or imitation strategies on firm performance in seven different industries in China. Firstly, we delineate and distinguish the concepts of innovation and imitation. Secondly, using the structural equation modelling method, we empirically test the impact of two dimensions of market and entrepreneurial orientations, on the decision to innovate or to imitate. Thirdly, we relate this decision to the company's performance. Based on a survey of 535 companies, 258 responded, our empirical results support the view that proactivity is the most important determinant in deciding whether to innovate or imitate, and we find that the company's performance is not determined by the decision to innovate or imitate, but rather, by the company's proactivity and focus on customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawei Liu, 2011. "Imitation or innovation to enhance the performance: an empirical investigation of 258 Chinese firms," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(4), pages 377-395.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:12:y:2011:i:4:p:377-395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=42014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu, Xiubao & Yan, Jie & Assimakopoulos, Dimitris, 2015. "Case analysis of imitative innovation in Chinese manufacturing SMEs: Products, features, barriers and competences for transition," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 520-525.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:12:y:2011:i:4:p:377-395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=3 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.