Are Spanish auditors effective in transmitting manipulation practices? An analysis of the ambiguity implicit in modified reports
AbstractThis study proposes auditors' effectiveness in the transmission (AET) of GAAP misstatements as a new measure of audit quality that is obtained from the audit report. We carry out a content analysis of the audit reports of a sample of 533 pre-bankrupt Spanish firms and find that the poorly enforced Spanish environment results in strategies of a lower than expected effectiveness in three aspects: the type of qualification chosen, the wording used and the adjustments proposed. We subsequently use AET to test for audit quality differences in three dimensions: auditor size, audit market experience and the client's closeness to failure. Larger auditors are more effective in the transmission of the GAAP misstatements. We also find increasing audit quality throughout our 1990-2001 period of analysis and with the clients' closeness to failure. Our results constitute a reference for regulators, not only in Spain, but also in similar European code-law regimes where qualifications for GAAP violations are usually included in the audit reports.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Inderscience Enterprises Ltd in its journal Int. J. of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation.
Volume (Year): 5 (2009)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=41
audit quality; audit report; bankruptcy; transmission effectiveness; GAAP misstatements; GAAP violations; independence; institutional environment; qualifications; Spain; manipulation practices; ambiguity; modified reports.;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Graham Langley) or (Christopher F. Baum).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.