IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjbm/v10y2011i3p7-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of Internal Rating Systems in Public Sector Banks of India

Author

Listed:
  • Monoshree Mahanta
  • Munindra Kakati

Abstract

The challenge before the Indian banks is the implementation of the new Basel framework, more popularly known as Basel II, as laid down by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). This has severe implications for credit risk practices in Indian banking, the way banks appraise credit proposals, price loans, manage credit risk at the individual and portfolio level, and also manage their NPAs. Indian banks have been preparing and implementing various measures for effective management of credit risk. One such measure is the development of internal rating models mostly in collaboration with the external agencies and banks have been using them for rating their loan accounts. This paper examines the internal credit rating models of public sector banks and tests their effectiveness using multiple criteria. All the models have exhibited poor performance (weaknesses) in at least one criterion. However, the level of weakness varied widely across the models. The findings tentatively support our hypothesis that the presence of weaknesses in the existing credit appraisal is a major cause of accounts turning into bad loans.

Suggested Citation

  • Monoshree Mahanta & Munindra Kakati, 2011. "Effectiveness of Internal Rating Systems in Public Sector Banks of India," The IUP Journal of Bank Management, IUP Publications, vol. 0(3), pages 7-33, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjbm:v:10:y:2011:i:3:p:7-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjbm:v:10:y:2011:i:3:p:7-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.