IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjae/v03y2004i3p37-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decentralization and Economic Development: Cross Country Experience with special reference to Sri Lanka

Author

Listed:
  • Nimal Herath

Abstract

Economists argue that decentralization is desirable to enhance growth and development. There is a big demand for decentralization in developing countries and economies in transition. In response to the civil crises aroused in 1983 and afterwards, Sri Lanka introduced a decentralized system of government in 1987 with one objective of achieving balanced regional development. Thus, the relationship between the degree of decentralization and economic development needs to be analyzed. Some empirical studies in respect of developing countries that based on quantitative data show that there is no positive relationship between economic growth and the degree of decentralization. This finding is consistent with the views of some other researchers and the theory of clubs. However, these findings are of little importance for the countries where there is a demand for the decentralized systems and such a situation ought to be analyzed in the light of cost benefit analysis. In Sri Lanka, the degree of decentralization is very low in comparison with other countries. There is a huge imbalance among regions in Sri Lanka. This may be a cause for rejecting Provincial Councils by minorities as a decentralized system. Policy makers should correct the imbalances in regional development to restore peace and order in the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Nimal Herath, 2004. "Decentralization and Economic Development: Cross Country Experience with special reference to Sri Lanka," The IUP Journal of Applied Economics, IUP Publications, vol. 0(3), pages 37-60, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjae:v:03:y:2004:i:3:p:37-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjae:v:03:y:2004:i:3:p:37-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.