IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hop/hopeec/v45y2013i3p415-442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beggars: Jeremy Bentham versus William Wordsworth

Author

Listed:
  • James P. Henderson

Abstract

During the Romantic period (roughly 1789 to 1834), social critics valued poetry as a guide “to the conduct of life and the establishment of moral principles.” John Stuart Mill observed that Jeremy Bentham rejected poetry because poets employed words imaginatively and not solely for “precise logical truth.” Bentham and William Wordsworth disputed the treatment of the poor. Bentham proposed forcing them into houses of industry. Wordsworth, who declared that “man is dear to man... [because] we have all of us one human heart,” celebrated a beggar’s power as a social agent. He reminds villagers of past acts of charity and offers the wretched poor an opportunity to give charity. Barely able to survive herself, one old woman “builds her hope in heaven” by sharing a small handful of meal with the beggar. Although the beggar has no economic value, he does have intrinsic value to the community.

Suggested Citation

  • James P. Henderson, 2013. "Beggars: Jeremy Bentham versus William Wordsworth," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 45(3), pages 415-442, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:45:y:2013:i:3:p:415-442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hope.dukejournals.org/content/45/3/415.full.pdf+html
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:45:y:2013:i:3:p:415-442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Center for the History of Political Economy Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.dukeupress.edu/Catalog/ViewProduct.php?viewby=journal&productid=45614 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.