Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Ist die Normalform die normale Form?


Author Info

  • Werner Güth

    (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Wirtschaftstheorie, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Berlin, Deutschland)

  • Hartmut Kliemt

    (Humboldt Universität Duisburg, Philosophie und Sozialwissenschaften, Duisburg, Deutschland)


Die Frage, welche Dartsellungsweise strategischer Interaktionen man als grundlegend für die spieltheoretische Analyse und insoweit als normale Form von Spielen anzusehen hat, ist keineswegs rein sprachlicher Natur. Systematische Gründe sprechen dafür, die Agentennormalform anstelle der klassischen von Neumann Morgenstern Normalform für die "normale" Form eines Spieles zu halten. Dies wird unter Bezug auf verschiedene Beispiele und in kritischer Auseinandersetzung mit abweichenden allgemeinen theoretischen Auffassungen begründet.

Download Info

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Institute of SocioEconomics in its journal Homo Oeconomicus.

Volume (Year): 12 (1995)
Issue (Month): ()
Pages: 155-183

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:hom:homoec:v:12:y:1995:p:155-183

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Von-Melle-Park 5, 20146 Hamburg
Phone: 49 40 42838-4457
Fax: 49 40 42838-6329
Web page:
More information through EDIRC

Related research



No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Werner Güth & Hartmut Kliemt & Stefan Napel, . "Wie Du mir, so ich Dir! - Ökonomische Theorie und Experiment am Beispiel der Reziprozität," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2002-19, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group.
  2. Siegfried Berninghaus & Werner Güth & Hartmut Kliemt, 2003. "Reflections on Equilibrium: Ideal Rationality and Analytic Decomposition of Games," Homo Oeconomicus, Institute of SocioEconomics, vol. 20, pages 257-302.


This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hom:homoec:v:12:y:1995:p:155-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Matthew Braham) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Matthew Braham to update the entry or send us the correct address.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.