IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/fsight/v5y2011i1p16-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology Platforms in the Russian Innovation Policy Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Pavel Rudnik

    (Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge, National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

Technology platforms are regarded as an important tool for linking disparate elements of the innovation system and shaping an integrated innovation framework. Platforms can be a part of the institutional framework for building relationships along one of the axes of the innovation system “universities – research organizations – industry” and provide a basis for the elaboration and implementation of focused and comprehensive innovation policy in different areas. The paper considers the process of shaping technology platforms in Russia and describes the contemporary context of their formation. This process is only at an early stage and is fragile. This is due to objective reasons, primarily a mutual misunderstanding of strategic interests. Until today the challenge of overcoming the existing gap hasn’t yet been scrutinized on the governmental level. The author presents the concept of public-private partnerships, various types of such cooperation and examines possible scenarios for their development. Methodologically the initiative to establish technology platforms in Russia draws heavily on the European experience, which is also disclosed in detail. The publication compares features of European and Russian technology platforms, describes the challenges and opportunities for their development, and identifies strengths and weaknesses of the platforms. A number of recommendations are provided. In particular, it is needed to follow the basic principles that have proven successful in the European practice; focus on the markets, not only on technology development and coordination of actions of a wide range of participants. All the core enterprises should be represented in a platform, not only governmental but also private ones. The platform should be established with close involvement of ministries and departments responsible for the strategic development of the relevant sectors. Indirect support measures will allow the coordination of the program of innovative development of state-owned enterprises with the platform strategy; define the topical scope of R&D projects as well as the amount of funding through federal targeted programmes etc. The author depicts some positive effects accompanying the establishments of technology platforms. The success of a platform depends on its ability to provide a strong involvement of the main actors of the national innovation system. A key role in this process belongs to the government. Note: Downloadable document is in Russian.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavel Rudnik, 2011. "Technology Platforms in the Russian Innovation Policy Practice," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 16-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:16-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://foresight-journal.hse.ru/data/2012/04/05/1251277627/16-25.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mikhail Gershman, 2013. "Innovation Development Programmes for the State-owned Companies: First Results," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 28-43.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovation policy; innovation system; technology platforms; science and business co-operation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth
    • O2 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:16-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nataliya Gavrilicheva or Mikhail Salazkin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.